Overrated "Classics"

Jul 21, 2003
458
4
18
Visit site
Today's Pick: Dark Angel Darkness Descends

Musical genres, like people, have lifespans with reconizable stops along the way. They are born, a shadow of what they will become. In adolescence, promise is present, but not fully realized. They mature into the full flowering of adulthood, and then begin the long, slow slide into obliveon.
It is this last stage which concerns us here. When a genre is creatively spent, bands tend to follow one of four paths into the grave. The first is to abandon the genre entirely, usually to embrace some form of whatever came before it (Metallica). The second is to embrace aethetic novelty as if it were genuine innovation (Anthrax). The third is to adopt a middle road, a style that represents a mean between the various artists who have come before (Testament). The fourth is to do exactly what everyone else has already done, but to it in some superficially more "extreme" fashion. Which brings us to Darkness Descends.

By the time Dark Angel got around to recording their second album, thrash had largely blown its wad as creatively viable genre. Though a few bands with connections to the thrash scene were still forging a viable way forward (notably Slayer, Kreator and Sodom), these bands were really only peripherally thrash bands at this point (though all would eventually fall back into making stale, useless thrash records) and are better understood as being a part of the next wave of extreme metal. Dark Angel, on the other hand, lacked any real vision of its own (like most second tier acts), and instead crafted an album that is legendary among legions of thrash fans, but is laughed at by those who know better.

What Dark Angel developed was a sound that recapitulated everything that had gone before in the genre, only in its most extreme form. More speed, more riffs, more raw vocals. This was enough to satisfy those for whom thrash was little more than an excuse to drink beer and bang their heads, but as an attempt at innovation, it was an utter failure. Stripped of its superficially "extreme" trappings, Darkness Descends offers little more than a double time rehash of the least interesting riffs from the first two Metallica and Slayer records, spliced together to form cumbersome, badly edited songs that play at being "progressive" while actually being boring, verse/chorus tripe. What is sadly missing here, along with artistic vision, is any genuine sense of melody. Instead, what we get is pure rhythm in the classic populist mould, moronic headbanging drivel for those who really expect nothing of consequence from music.
 
I don't give a shit about every single thing I listen to being amazingly innovative.
 
Darkness Descends isn't THE best thrash metal cd ever....but it is pretty damn close....I think it's a little repetitive....I don't care when if it isn't the most original...it's easily top 5
 
Thrash is suppose to make you headbang like a retard for the entire duration of an album. While you have beer sitting in front of you, you're suppose to have competitions with your friend seeing who can drink more beer during a song section.

Thrash is not suppose to play with your dick while you're having a brain aneurysm, that wrecks the whole purpose of thrashing. It's suppose to make you thrash like fuck. Whatever thrash album makes you thrash the hardest wrecklessly is the best thrash album.

THRASH, not Thrashterbation.

Things are overrated because people, not because the band and album.
 
The best a derivative artist can ever aspire to is mediocrity.

Well, derivative in what sense, or to what extent? One can certainly argue that in order to be WHOLLY original, an artist must first disclaim every remaining vestige of their natural influences. Would you recommend such a method for achieving COMPLETE innovation? Can art's quality truly be gauged by its degree of innovation in contrast with its degree of derivation?

I suppose what I'm asking is, is it possible to achieve complete and unquestioned originality?

Personally, I feel there have been innumerable instances over the last decade or so of an artist achieving perfection while working within the sphere of convention.
 
DiscipleofPlato said:
Personally, I feel there have been innumerable instances over the last decade or so of an artist achieving perfection while working within the sphere of convention.

Yes.

That being said, DD fucken rules!
 
Life Sucks said:
How about Master of Puppets for an overrated classic?

This was going to be my post until I saw that this thread was about one album.