Blaphbee said:
Maybe I'm not clear enough for the crowd here:
Slipknot aren't bad, but they most certainly are not good, nor is there an even remote possibility that will ever be great.
They're mediocre space-filler. They're also largely irrelevant. They appeal to the tastes of the Crowd. They're good at mass appeal. Artistically, they're inert.
Pantera is even worse than them, largely due to their own pretensions of considering themselves to be a "great" "metal" band. Pantera is so much more laughably irrelevant than Slipknot as to make the latter band appear to be Renaissance men.
pantera has no fucking opinions of themselves,
they dont exist anymore
they are not irrelevant they influenced metal immensly and continue to this day.
something you have to realize about metal around this time: metal had little exposure and few bands. metallica, slayer, iron maiden were around but underground metal didn't exist.
pantera
was underground in this time period and set the stage for underground metal. they didn't get airplay, no rotation on mtv, they didn't even get exposure here in
texas. they fought and earned all the recognition they got and yes, they are overrecognized because dimebag died, and i am getting sock and fucking tired of the rip dimebag dumbasses, but they are not shit and they are not glam. i hate shit like in this river by bls(yet i love that band)and the fucking rip dimebag shirt everyone seems to have, but i still love pantera. you people are dumbasses sometimes
seriously. if anyone can tell me how the fuck they got to be called glamtera and convince me of it
i will leave and stay gone
lets see if anyone can, but i seriously doubt it
come on KMADD, doden, susperia, al bundy. let's see what you got