TheKorruptor
Member
I voted Paul.. mainly because Killers was on the radio today for some reason and it reminded me of his awesomeness. It's pretty much a coin-toss between him and Bruce though.. Don't care too much for Blaze..
Not bad feelings or anything. I love Paul, "Killers" is the best Maiden album but everyone that say Paul has a very similar voice to the early days is simply deaf.
alright who's the wise guy who voted for blaze?
thats a minority among minoritiesProbably JD, although knowing him he would have posted a defense of his vote. There are some Blaze fans in here, believe or not
thats a minority among minorities
Look at the poll, there are already 2 votes
bruce is the best singer for maiden but these days blaze has a much stronger voice live. sure he can't sing as high but but it just sounds more powerful. its louder and doesn't sound like its a pain to sing
Probably JD, although knowing him he would have posted a defense of his vote. There are some Blaze fans in here, believe or not
I agree with you in that Paul was/is a dull frontman but i will add, and i'm sure i will get flamed for this, that his vocals are overrated on the first albums and that i much prefer Bruces' versions of those songs much much better... imo people are just so used to Paul's vocals on those albums that no one is able to see/hear someone else doing them if those albums were recorded with someone else back then like Bruce... If Bruce had been the original vocalist we probably would of been saying the same comments were are saying about Paul right now... as for Blaze... ewwww.. what a huge mistake that was...Interesting for me is the other way around, the guy had a great voice at the time (don't know now) but he was a pretty dull frontman. Bruce came and gave not only his vocals but a live energy DiAnno didn't had IMO. Then again, DiAnno was the man for those two albums.
blaze's solo albums>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>maidens 3 newer bruce albums
i much prefer Bruces' versions of those songs much much better
If Bruce had been the original vocalist we probably would of been saying the same comments were are saying about Paul right now
I don't care about Blaze albums, but it won't surprise me. The Maiden albums since the reunion had been pretty dissapointing to me.
On the other hand Dickinson solo albums (minus TM) are all great and better of anything that Maiden have done since 1989.
I don't, sorry different tastes. As a matter of fact I have one of Samson albums with Bruce and it's not a big deal, so maybe the time and place when Dickinson joint IM for NOTB was the proper one for the whole engine to click correctly.
Maybe yes, maybe no. Like all what if scenarios there's only speculation in the end.
i except x factor which seems to be the only album maiden got right since the 80's. in the 80's maiden did 1 or 2 long epic tunes and everything else was less than 5 minutes.