Cigarettes are bad news that's for sure, but marijuana joints have no filters and even if they did,
**Some cigs have no filters.***
they still have 4 times the carcinogens of a regular cigarette, and they also contribute to memory loss.
**YEah, so does swiming under water. SO does mountain climbing. So does OLD AGE.**
On a related note, a news story just released today says that medical studies have indicated that long term use of tobacco smoking can lead to mild memory loss for middle aged adults
**related?**
I never made that particular argument. If I did, then your assessment would be correct.
**Your only arguing your opinion. FUck mcdonalds, you like the food hey? Get rid of weed, cause you dont know a thing about it other than what youve been told. Dangerouse to others around you? Your speaking out your ass agian. ***
The "bad for you" argument is more of an incentive to stop the activity, not a justification for banishment.
**Youve changes lanes now. Ive noticed that since your gay ass friend came along and fell over his own words, as you haev a habbit of doing***
The argument I use for keeping marijuana and other drugs illegal is based on the infringment of liberty and life of those surrounding the user.
**Well, my freedom is being infringed on, my freedom of coming to this forum and not haveing to see your reatrd statements. ALso, i must work, or i dont eat. Shouldnt i have the freedom of eating wheather i work or not? Am i also enfringing on your freedom by expelling all the poisonous gasses from my car? Am i enfringing on others freedom as i use elecricity, which in turn depletes the ozone layer? Get off it pal. Your in teritory you know nothing abiout. STop making excuses. ANd just admit YOU DONT REALLY KNOW WHAT YOUR TALKING ABOUT. YOU AHVE NO CLUE IF WEED IS DANGEROUSE> YOU HAEV NO CLUE WHAT IT DOES TO YOU. YOU ARE CLUELESS.***
Obviously one on PCP is more dangerous than one high on ganja for sure, but any drug that alters the mind is an "enemy of reality" and a potential for a dangerous situation that could harm someone else.
**I could slip you some THC and tell you it was PCP and you wouldnt know the difference. Same for any drug. Your falling back on old excuses again. We haev already discussed the fact that you are noone to speak of what a drug can do or not do to a person. Rememebr, your drug free, which normally is a good thing, but when you try to talk as if you knwo it all about drugs, and yove never taken any, well, your not really a good person for the job here. You had to study for tests, well, go get a big ass fat joint. smoke it, and then come back and tell us how dangerouse it is.***
The line is drawn at those drugs which provide an instant unpredictable intoxication. Marijuana certainly falls in that category.
***You see, your wrong again. Weed is not unpredictable. ITs the same high everytime versus the amount of intake. I just hit a Joint 2 times a few minutes ago. I did it for the taste. Not high, not even a little. Thats called moderation. ALso, i only smoked one joint yesterday, in my case, THATS MODERATION. Your WRONG just stop? You said you were gonna do it. I thought we all agreed on this? You dont know your ass from a BUGGER when it concerns drugs.**
Cigarettes and Alcohol can be taken in moderation.
** i cant smoke a cig in moderation. i cnat just smoke one. I can do without weed when i find that i cant get it. BUt cigs, i go crazy, shake, get mean, hatefull, etc. You or no else who have never doen cigs or weed even have the CONSTUTUTIONAL right to say anything about them. Cigs are a million times harder to get off of than weed. ANd alc, do you know any one ADDICTED To alc? If you do, then surely you would know that at timea an alcoholic will sell thier cars, clothes etc fro a fucking DRINK. Your going to far. Im finding myself getting teh urge to call you names and the feeling that giving you bodily harm would make me feel better. You really need to let it go. SO we all can.**
The 2nd ammendment does not distinguish between types of firearms but it is explicit in it's meaning that US Governement shall not infringe on the liberty to own and bear any type of weapon.
***Even though fully ato weapons were not in exostance at the time the constiutution was written? ANd it was against teh laws of teh time for teh colonists to even make a constitution. The constitution was made cause the king was holding the good weed for himself. NOt really, buit close, along the same lines. The greater part of teh ppl living in the colonies didnt like teh laws so they chnaged them.
Back to teh weapons....Fully auto...Im al for guns. I own many myself, and i will continue to acumlate more guns. BUt dude, i dont need a fucking M60, or a 50 cal fully auto, and you dont either. Make a real argument why dont you. Get educated with books, and the real deal, then come back.***
During the revolutionary period the militias and ordinary people carried the same types of arms the military carried (Flintlocks, muskets, etc.) This matched firepower, just short of cannons, provided an equal playing field and kept the Government in check to prevent tyrrany.
***Just short you say? Think about that. Your fucking stupid. You wnat a 50 cal, but you dont want me to smoke a joint. Dude, your not getting anywhere with your stupidness. your in a hole, and you only think you see the rope.**
The 2nd ammendment was written to provide that kind of protection from oppresive governments.
**I would think you would support a supressive government. You sure come accross that way. Half baked ideas, half baked senteces, and excuses. Jump dude, do it. JUMP. DO the world a favor.**
Today, that would mean the ability to own fully automatic weapons with high capacity magazines utlitizing armour piercing ammunition. These types of weapons should not be regulated at all. The only laws that should be in place with regard to these types of weapons should be the penalties of crimes committed using such firearms, and any firearm for that matter. You sure did. Your arguments were good, well thought out, and respected. And, no, you didn't call me any names. Thanks. It makes the debate so much more interesting when we can exchange ideas without all the slander. I've found new respect for you , neal. Thanks again, man.
**he hasnt found repsect fopr you. Your even more of a fucking mongaloid than i thought. I hope you get shot with a fully auto weapon.***
***In teh mean time...please stop this stupid shit kiyardo. Your not coming across like a good person. Your just not. Bann a joint and replace it with a fucking NUK. your thinking makes no sence. BTW, i have owned a fully auto weapon. VEry dangerous, adn much more un predictable than a joint. You have proven that you hail from a cave in the middle of nowhere. You have proven yourself to be a fucking one sided, uniformed person who wants to pick the rights the everyone else at his own convenience.
***
