Am I the only one that thinks this is just a satire on the whole VCC-not-out-yet fiasco?
you're NOT ALONE my friend. i thought this exact thing the second i saw this post on GS....
And to answer another question, YES, I'VED TRIED NEBULA and some of the SSL G(?) Series console programs..... it's definitely more subtle and 'cleaner' than VCC I will say....
ALSO, it doesn't seem to mess with the audio in a 'dynamic' way like VCC does. I still think it sounds f'ing awesome, as Ermz has proven to us time and time again!
thing is, Nebula is never stable on my system. it seems to just fuck my projects up and then vanish... =D
Hmm. You guys are going off at him for praising his product and not giving any samples or demos, and at the same time you bash the product without hearing any samples or demos? Anyone else see the irony here?
I'm gonna give it a spin when it's out and decide if it's worth the money after that. I'm a bit sceptical, but interested for sure.
[UEAK]Clowd;9646689 said:no ilok is gonna suck for you when its cracked
should implement that shit.
gonna be toughhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh to beat VCC.
as a beta tester, i have to say, even in it's lastest beta form (released some time ago, 2.5) that VCC SLAYS. For real. Everything starts geling and congealing together SUPER fast with VCC. It's almost like a VERY dynamic EQ and compression + saturation in one plug BUT SUPER tasteful. IDK if there is ANY processing like that going on at all inside VCC, so don't take my word for it. BUT, that's kind of what i'm hearing. it really is quite hard to explain!
i'm strapping it across most tracks + a few mix buss instances and it sounds like nothing i've heard before...
YMMV.
This.
I'll keep an eye out for these, but will be surprised if they impress me as much as VCC does.
CJ, you get your iLok 2 from Slate yet?