i'm a bigger fan of the earlier years, up through moving pictures--aftk, hemispheres, 2112... starting with signals they started to get a little heavy on the keys....not to say they don't have some righteous 80/90s material; subdivisions, distant early warning, roll the bones are all pretty rad, some of my favorites. i really like vapor trails, i haven't heard feedback but i can't wait for the next full-length. rush was also one of the best live shows i've seen.dorian gray said:Allright, one comment: Rush's 3-4-5 series were incredible pieces of craftsmanship that, to me, are all on the same level. I think from there, they stepped it up another notch, sonically and "progressively", until the mid 90s, when they got a little too boring.
End of transmission.
yeah, feedback is great but way too short. i guess it *is* just an EP, but it's disappointing when you realize it's over. you like vapor trails? i took a listen but couldn't get into it. maybe i'll check it out again.cthulufhtagn said:i'm a bigger fan of the earlier years, up through moving pictures--aftk, hemispheres, 2112... starting with signals they started to get a little heavy on the keys....not to say they don't have some righteous 80/90s material; subdivisions, distant early warning, roll the bones are all pretty rad, some of my favorites. i really like vapor trails, i haven't heard feedback but i can't wait for the next full-length. rush was also one of the best live shows i've seen.
will do.wwallinga said:Give Vapor Trails another chance. It is very good IMO and better than Test for Echo.
While we're on the topic of Rush, I highly recommend Neil Peart's book "Ghost Rider". In case you didn't know, his wife and daughter both died around '99 and this book is an amazing journey through emotions I hope I never have to experience.
wwallinga said:Maybe, but you ask rhetorical questions so we'll never be able to prove it.