Reputation

[Mark]

Do you think that people who receive rep (good or bad) should be able to see who it is from?

 

[Mark]

Oh - replies as to why you think it should/shouldn't be visible would be appreciated.

 

[xenophobe]

Okay.

Well, I sign my neg and most of my positive...

If someone doesn't want rep, they should be able to deselct the option completely, so one cannot give to them.

But, you are the final deciding factor. Your call boss.

 

[Cat5Messiah]

I think it should be enabled because of the fact that often times people are curious on who repped them (good or bad). Also, for the reason for one to rep that person back (again, good or bad).

 

[Mark]

Maybe we should just not have rep at all?

 

[Lady Vampy]

I like to know who gives me rep so that I can reciprocate if it's good and find out why if it's bad (haven't had any bad rep yet but I have had grey rep once).

 

[tooled]

i wanna see.. i wanna feel.. i wanna give.. i wanna get some..

 

[Voice of God]

Maybe we should just not have rep at all?

Thumbs up for this.

 

[Beth]

Maybe we should just not have rep at all?

Yes, no rep. Sorry, Mark, but rep sucks

It's like a third-grade popularity contest.

*reps Mark again*

vBulletin Message

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Mark again.​

 

[DotNoir]

I wanna participate in 3rd grade popularity contest... I think it should be made visible who gives rep... Or not... well, I don't know...

But on the otherhand, then the people who get alot negative rep would start to make alot whining threads about "why that person gave me negative rep?!?! ! " etc. dumb shit.

But we already have threads "Who the hell gave me this rep?" so, which would be better... Then again... Meh

 

[Ultimate_Symphony]

But then it starts the revenge circle.
If you give one person negative rep for a reason...
he/ she gives you negative rep back, just cause you gave him/her negative rep...

Therefor I say... keep it anonymous...

I agree. I say keep it anonymous.

 

[Profanity]

Do you think that people who receive rep (good or bad) should be able to see who it is from?

Yes

I usually don't sign my rep but I still want people to know i've sent it. Having to sign each rep slows me down and gets me out of routine.

People who give rep shouldn't be ashamed of the rep they give.

 

[Profanity]

I agree. I say keep it anonymous.

Why do you agree?

 

[ffanatic]

I agree, because:

A) it makes is easier to return the favor (in the case of postive rep).

and

B) people may be less inclined to give negative rep so easily if it is signed.

 

[Profanity]

I agree, because:

A) it makes is easier to return the favor (in the case of postive rep).

and

B) people may be less inclined to give negative rep so easily if it is signed.

a) But people like me who don't sign never get the favour returned.

b) If there is a genuine reason for giving negative rep then there is no reason to hide it.

 

[Ultimate_Symphony]

Why do you agree?

Did you read the quote I included on my post?

 

[Sonnenritter]

If you decide to keep the rep system at all, I'd like to know who gave me the rep. As for reasons... I guess to discourage anonymous negative rep.

 

[NaTaSMAI]

But we already have threads "Who the hell gave me this rep?" so, which would be better... Then again... Meh

I haven't seen a thread like that in a while, seems like the excitement has died down. I say we keep it how it is, that we we avoid people bitching about it.

 

[Taliesin]

If there is a genuine reason for giving negative rep then there is no reason to hide it.

Oh FOR FUCK'S SAKE! I agree with... Profanity
I hafta give it to you... I was gonna say the same.
And of course, I always sign my negative rep. Unsigned negative rep shouldnt be worth anything...

Oh.. and I agree with Natasmai.. leave it like it is

 

[Wolfenmond]

Hm, í've voted for "yes", since i'm a curious person myself, and i think that this is a good method to prevent people from giving negative rep just for the sake of it or somewhat...