EagleFlyFree
crack you like an acorn
phyre said:this sure brings some attention to Royal Carnage. :Smug:
you post a bad review into the band's forum to gain publicity, you fucking suck >:-(
phyre said:this sure brings some attention to Royal Carnage. :Smug:
I don't think that was Papa Josh's main purpose, as I said...EagleFlyFree said:you post a bad review into the band's forum to gain publicity, you fucking suck >:-(
Papa Josh said:The band has stopped being relevant... hell, were they ever? Their songs aren't very strong at all. I'll admit, some of Hatebreeder was good and I even liked a cut or two off of Follow the Reaper, but the dude's vocals have got to go.
And if I want Yngwie, I'll listen to Yngwie. Not Children of BOREDOM.
So what you're basically saying here is "you don't like Children of Bodom, so you and your site suck?"RockBodom said:Half the reviews on you guys' site are a load of bullshit. Give or take a few. Do you think you're going to become the forefront of the internet in terms of metal album reviews? That'd be a laugh. Shut your site down. It sucks. Go buy more pot with the money you get from the server being taken offline. Maybe if you were -straight- enough to write a decent review, then you might have a SLIM chance of having the site make it on the net. As of right now, NEVER. Get out of the fucking house and look at the sun. There's a world outside this box...and the box isnt worth crying over . Oh and the stuff about the members not showing respect for the band by giving legitimate responses on this board and all that good shit? Maybe you should respect the band YOU'RE reviewing in your REVIEW so you won't sound so god damned biased. You're not Zakk Wylde, and you CAN'T just get away with saying "fuck this" and "fuck that". You sound like a 12 year old who just learned to whine and swear in the same sentence. Go cry to your mom.
What it is to me is a record full of rehashed, tired-sounding songwriting, boring riffs and wankery, mind-numbingly lame lyrics and not really much at all to grab my interest. You know, if you had read the review thoroughly, you would've noticed that I even said I enjoyed some previous CoB works, but their formulaic approach is getting VERY tiresome after 4 releases in muchly the same style.Needled24Seven said:another thing there is one huge problem with your review, its that you obviously have something against cob from previous issues. you cant just give them 3 out of 10 because there is so much talent in there that even if you didnt enjoy it yourself you could appreciate it for what it is.
Objectively? OBJECTIVELY?!? Do you understand what the purpose of a record review is? A record review is, per definition, the reviewers subjective opinion of the album. There is very little room for objectivity in a review, other than straight facts such as "this record was recorded in 2003," "the guitars are competently performed" and things of that sort.Stun said:You think I'm a fanboy? Whatever. You posted a ridiculous review... you didn't even remotely look at it objectively.
Yes, you said that before, and I asked you to explain yourself, because to me that is a total non sequitur.Stun said:Like I said before, whoever wrote it obviously didn't know shit about music, and barely manages to listen to a song much less evaluate it and review the entire album.
If, for example, someone who raped my cat and murdered my girlfriend was in Children of Bodom, I'd have a BIAS against them. As it stands now, I merely express my opinion. You can't just go around saying that a negative review equals bias against the band, that's asinine if anything.Needled24Seven said:i would have to agree since the website lets a biased like this asshole do a review, who obviously has no clue what hes talking about. the bottom line is no respectable webzine lets a person who is baised towards a certain band do a review on that band...end of story...
Are you saying he has no clue based on the low score he gave? If you read the review, all criticism of the album is very well supported. It may differ from your opinion, and that's fine, but you can't say it's not bolstered journalism.Needled24Seven said:i would have to agree since the website lets a biased like this asshole do a review, who obviously has no clue what hes talking about.
Well, if our journalists only write reviews for bands that they love, then all our reviews would be given high scores by default. And that would make for uninteresting reading, no?the bottom line is no respectable webzine lets a person who is baised towards a certain band do a review on that band...end of story...
Papa Josh said:Personally, I like Alexi's work on IMPALED NAZARENE's Nihil more than any of his BODOM work.
Needled24Seven said:do i need to explain this statement to you two?
so far all i can tell is that your review was based on feelings and youve shown no sing that you actually know anything about music or any music theory at all. so ill just assume you dont and keep wondering why youre actually writing reviews in the first place.