Well, nobody ever made the claim that people get depressed because of an antidepressant deficiency. That's why I called it a strawman.
Are you just making this claim for mental disorders or is it more general? If it's a more general claim it's a pretty damn bold claim to make. If you're just referring to medication for depression, do you know what the root cause of depression is so that you can draw that conclusion or do you have some other reason?
Malnutrition = weaker immune systems. Also, over-sterilization can create a situation where the good/bad bacteria balance is out of balance opening the door to "stronger" bad bacteria that normally would have been kept in check. MRSA in hospitals is a perfect example.
I am not saying in a bad situation you can't use medication once all other avenues have been tried, but there are always negative side affects on your body. Strengthening your body through better nutrition never has a negative side effect.
I would say that you overestimate the importance of nutrition in immunity and health Dakryn.
It tends to only really have an effect in severe mal-nutrition, which the majority of people do not suffer from.
And I don't exactly see how I backed up your argument. I showed you that anti-depressants increase natural neurotransmitter levels that help adjust the low mood that is present in Depression. An awful lot of medication acts in a similar fashion.
The end aim of any disease that a doctor is treating is a full cure. Anyone who is overweight, hypertensive and or diabetic is going to be told to lose weight, improve diet and exercise. But to reduce immediate risk they'll also be given ACE inhibitors, etc. to lower their BP while they adjust their lifestyle. If not then they're at much higher risk of Stroke and MI - obviously not a positive outcome. I accept that there are some diseases where a full cure is not possible.
Not all people take the advice they're given, but I think you have a somewhat distorted view of the actual aims, workings and reasoning of most medication. Suggesting all medication only treats the symptoms is pretty rediculous when you think about Chemotherapy.
still no answers for manic depressive, bi-polar temperments, being totally wacked, anerexic (scuse my spelling as always), obsessive compulsive and other issues, maybe you havent seen it first hand. My point is those without such issues should be greatful and not pose to know the answers. At one time I always felt through strong mental "power" one could control their quirks but no longer believe that to be true in more complex issues.
Sorry but my belief is you have the non-arguement and apparent non exposure
Mental "quirks" can have so many varying causes, but in many cases it has to do with abuse/instability growing up (which is really broad)/poor nutrition.
Really think hard about that statement.
Sever malnutrition is not just "not getting enough to eat". You can get tons of calories and not be getting a proper amount of any given vitamin or mineral, or worse, getting tons of toxins instead (which is the case with all the fast food and processed food in the American diet).
But modern medicine uses counselling, CBT etc. to treat and identify the cause. I accept anti-depressants are a stop-gap but I don't understand your aggression towards them.Exactly, the cause is not addressed, merely the symptom of abnormal neurotransmitter levels.
You just contradicted your first statement. Regarding "uncurable diseases", they are out there (like AIDS for instance), but for many diseases that "modern medicine" can't cure, or can't past certain levels of advancement, there is plenty of anecdotal evidence out there that natural solutions have cured it.
"Scientific evidence" is lacking because if these people become better, they go on about their life, not to mention they did it seperate from the medical establishment, so it's not like it is going to be promoted. Medicine is just as much a business as anything else out there, and merely interested in it's survival.
"Natural health" involves business too, but not on the same level, and considering you could technically grow/make everything yourself, it's a far cry from needing someone with 8+ years in college and some toxins from a lab with a positive side effect.
Chemotherapy merely kills cells, healthy and cancerous. It doesn't address what caused cancer in the first place.
Of course it is a factor. I didn't say it wasn't, but you appear to not be taking account of human physiology. I agree that a poor diet, regularly lacking in vitamins and essential AA's/fats is going to cause poor growth, and lower than average health. You appear to be suggesting that by having a perfect diet, you make yourself immune by a far higher level than is actually true.
But modern medicine uses counselling, CBT etc. to treat and identify the cause. I accept anti-depressants are a stop-gap but I don't understand your aggression towards them.
Anecdotal evidence is not an excuse. Until these "natural" cures have been throughly tested and stastically proven I remain a sceptic. You do realise that the majority of modern medication stems from naturally occuring substances? Most obvious example is Digoxin (Foxglove). However, "natural" substances usually contain lots of crap that you don't want, and cause other side effects. Drugs are improved, refined versions of these. (Albeit still with side-effects)
I can only quote Tim Mincham here.. "You know what they call Alternative Medicine thats been proved to work? MEDICINE!"
Majority of healthcare professionals would say that Cancer is the disease. Its the tumour that causes all the problems. Trying to identify the cause of a tumour, unless its a returning one, is somewhat difficult. Unless the patient is a chain smoking 45 year old with Lung cancer, or someone with Malignant Melanoma and an addiction to sunbeds, its pretty much boils down to luck.
Chemotherapy isn't perfect I agree, but its one of the most effective interventions at the moment.
@ Razoredge
For whatever reason (genetic, brain structure...) some people get them others don't.