sooooo
now to stop that "TS7 is exactly the same as TS9" bullshit once and for all here are the clips and pics.....
the pics alone should make everyone clear that these CANNOT be sounding exactly alike...they might feature the same circuit, but the different capacities etc cause by different spacing between conductors etc DO have an effect..also are different parts used.
(pics will be uploaded later)
here are the clips
the boosts used were:
-stock TS9 (one with the 4558, not the 2043DD chip...which sound really bad)
-TS9 modded to 808 specs
-TS7 modded to 808 specs (compare this one with the 808 modded ts-9!)
-stock MT2
-stock MC402 (not really set for tubescreamer tone...this was the setting I used to boost a 2203....yummi!!
well those odd two are just a bonus, the main comparison is between the three tubescreamers
you'll find out that the TS7-808 sounds good for the money but it does sound more 2d and less open than the TS9-808
the difference of course was the same before I modded them to 808 specs
now to stop that "TS7 is exactly the same as TS9" bullshit once and for all here are the clips and pics.....
the pics alone should make everyone clear that these CANNOT be sounding exactly alike...they might feature the same circuit, but the different capacities etc cause by different spacing between conductors etc DO have an effect..also are different parts used.
(pics will be uploaded later)
here are the clips
the boosts used were:
-stock TS9 (one with the 4558, not the 2043DD chip...which sound really bad)
-TS9 modded to 808 specs
-TS7 modded to 808 specs (compare this one with the 808 modded ts-9!)
-stock MT2
-stock MC402 (not really set for tubescreamer tone...this was the setting I used to boost a 2203....yummi!!
well those odd two are just a bonus, the main comparison is between the three tubescreamers
you'll find out that the TS7-808 sounds good for the money but it does sound more 2d and less open than the TS9-808
the difference of course was the same before I modded them to 808 specs