Dragons_Kin
Member
That is some really messed up shit. Besides MJ being a freak, that kid's not too bright either.TD said:Check this sick shit out:
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/doc_o_day/doc_o_day.html
That is some really messed up shit. Besides MJ being a freak, that kid's not too bright either.TD said:Check this sick shit out:
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/doc_o_day/doc_o_day.html
Good point......The guy was convicted like 10 years old for the first time. He still has kids visiting him all the time and you never hear any other accusations. When Bill Clinton and that whole sex sancdal thing women were constantly trying to press charges.DESPO424 said:Ya know what's very interesting. The state can bring charges up against the parents of the child, because they can technically be held responsible for putting the child in an unsafe situation by letting him stay with Michael Jackson.
I mean Michael Jackson does have a history, and if he is convicted of anything in this, then the parents, by law, can face charges from the state for putting the child's well being in danger.
i dunno man its a bit of a mystery pack that one,priests are prob the highest offending and they get away with it because there supposedly the good guys,at the end of the day if someone attacked my kid(i dont have any that i know of lol)but wouldnt accepting money be a copout,wouldnt u want justice?TD said:I'd leave my kids with my priest in a second dude.
I would, too. (Note: I do have kids.)TD said:I'd leave my kids with my priest in a second dude.