JayKeeley said:I have no idea what to call it but so far everyone seems to be on the money with recommendations, so it serves a purpose. Plus the website stonerrock.com seems to reflect what most people would perceive as "stoner rock".
That aside, have you heard Wolfmother & Early Man yet? I have to assume you have by this point, since you're always ahead of the curve in this genre.
Fixed.NADatar said:Cloris Leachman > Madeline Kahn > Teri Garr > every woman I've ever dated
I'll have to keep an eye out for them.JayKeeley said:No no no no....give it a fair listen on the MP3s.
Wouldn't be the first time.JayKeeley said:I honestly think this is going to be one of those CDs where you'll listen to it again on your Shures, cranking the volume, and think to yourself, "what was I thinking, this shit is smokin'.".
Right now, smart money is on the spoon.JayKeeley said:Or you could end up stabbing yourself with a spoon. Who knows.
all right, all right, cosmic doom it is thenIOfTheStorm said:"Stoner rock" is just an unfair name for a genre, doesn't mean anything , it is stupid as a "meaning" and it is stupid because it describes music that exists decades before the first so called "stoner rock" bands or the possible beginning of the genre. Also most so called "stoner rock" bands hate that they are being labeled like this. The website is just a fashion victim too.
NADatar said:Oh yeah and JayK, there's this group that Doomicifer shoved down my throat, I forget their name but they had a shitload of rad guitar solos and their album cover was dark green with like a yellow sword or something. I liked but didn't love them, but I think you would love the tits off them. Or in them even, I dunno.
Demilich said:How does that make a label useless? Only if you expect the label to entail one specific sound. If there is a characteristic that can be used to unite a bunch of music under a common label, why not do it?