While everyone's opinion is true, to that person, I can't disagree with Matthias more. I LOVE the direction SX has gone in, and I have listened to Iconoclast at least 100 times. Yes, I said 100, with two zeroes. I said they couldn't top Paradise Lost, but Iconoclast does, by a small margin. They just get better, tighter, and truer to their own selves, and it shows. I bet if you asked them they'd say they are much happier now that they stopped bending to the whims of audiophiles and started doing what they like. I, for one, am ecstatic. I must not be alone, because their sales are higher than ever. I'm a music snob, and it is Symphony X's fault. All other music is "not Symphony X."
You must not care about songwriting.
I feel that your point disproves itself.
Audiophiles (usually) would prefer the sound on IC over V or Divine. We're asking for something more real-sounding, not over-produced.
The fact that it's selling more isn't proof that it's better; if anything, it proves that it's more mainstream, which is anti-music snob.
There was a time when SX did the same thing to me as they did to you. They were the only band I listened to for a while because everything else paled in comparison. This was before PL.
Now, I rarely listen to them and I've moved on to what I consider better things.
New SX, although I do enjoy it, is mainly for teenagers.
SX not only somewhat lost me in their new direction, but the fact that they've only had two releases since 2002 is also affecting my interest.
PL was not deep enough to retain interest for 4 years, and neither is IC.
Agreed. I still listen to their older albums from time to time, as well as a few songs off PL.
Again, the production is not what makes or breaks IC (or any other album of theirs). I can enjoy incredibly over-produced work if the songwriting is great. Bal-Sagoth's The Chthonic Chronicles is an example of this. Symphonic black metal genius with super tight production.