this
what's wrong with this forum lately?
who cares if there's click bleed or a vocal glitch or a bad edit on a CD?
nothing to get moist over.....this forum used to be about learning about production, not about finding flaws in other people's productions to feel better.
The only difference is, in this case Joey is being criticized for an obvious LACK of any of that "bad" stuff (i.e. the stuff that makes recordings sound like they were done by humans, lol). Vocal glitch, click bleed, etc. aren't the same as having a vocal line so perfect that it sounds artificial...Not in the sense of "cher vocals", but in the sense of "damn, this is SPOT ON in terms of tempo, key, etc., so it HAS to be auto tuned!"
I think there already is somewhat of a backlash or counter culture to the idea of using POD's, samples, etc. in general, makes sense that auto tuning would follow suit.
I'm all for doing whatever works in the studio to produce the best results for each band's standards, because to me utilizing the studio to get great results is an extension of what each of us try to do with our instruments...But I think vocals can be a sticking point because it's fairly obvious that probably 99% of vocalists in heavier music truly can't sing, whereas I think that's not so obvious in instrument players (or they can "fake it" better).
So where POD's and samples and beat detective, etc. are/were initially used as time/money savers, I think to some it seems that ideal has been raped to the point where you can *almost* credit the engineer for EVERYTHING on the CD rather than a band. Before, you'd hear about using auto tune to fix a small little mess up here and there. Now it seems like you can just speak monotone into a mic and voila! you can have a vocal track.
That said, I'd bet most pro level dudes could churn out a mix by the bands they do without a lot of the studio "tricks" and they'd still sound reasonably good in terms of the artists talents...The only instrument I could see maybe not being as good would be sung vocals.