The Military/War Thread
- Thread starter Dak
- Start date
rms
Active Member
that quote isnt from the website he claims is bias. You're idiocy/illiteracy has caught up with you once again.
maybe one day you'll go to war like a big boy
don't really care which website he was referring to, that line is so fucking dumb it makes anything you post have even less value than it already had
TechnicalBarbarity
Poser Disposer
TechnicalBarbarity
Poser Disposer
Wow. You guys need to take you nationalist goggles off. The nerve of you guys claiming that other sites are biased is truly mind-numbing numbing. oh da ironiez.
all you guys are doing is basically saying ... "I dont like the sources quoted there". "No fuck what the chief designer of the weapon claims"(one of countless sources). "But i'd rather get my info from some butt-fuck western/British website/info group.
Russian President Vladimir Putin is reportedly planning to replace the country's older SS-18 Satan weapons with the new missiles amid a string of recent disagreements with the West. The Kremlin has stepped up the rhetoric against the West and carried a series of manoeuvres that has infuriated politicians in the US and UK.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...sile-Super-nuke-destroy-area-size-FRANCE.html
... solid article
all you guys are doing is basically saying ... "I dont like the sources quoted there". "No fuck what the chief designer of the weapon claims"(one of countless sources). "But i'd rather get my info from some butt-fuck western/British website/info group.
Russian President Vladimir Putin is reportedly planning to replace the country's older SS-18 Satan weapons with the new missiles amid a string of recent disagreements with the West. The Kremlin has stepped up the rhetoric against the West and carried a series of manoeuvres that has infuriated politicians in the US and UK.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...sile-Super-nuke-destroy-area-size-FRANCE.html
... solid article
CiG
Approximately Infinite Universe
Sidenote: trying to claim that Russian sourced information isn't biased just because it's self-referential (do you trust American articles talking about the American military hurdur) rather than because it's fucking Russia is kinda lol.
TechnicalBarbarity
Poser Disposer
okay, so military-today.com, dailymail.uk along with the HUNDREDS of similar articles form all parts of the world are all Russian sourced right? Did you even bother reading through any related article before spewing out your nonsense bruh? Talking out of your loose asses has become a daily habit for some of you. truly sad and pathetic. I think im just going to stick to the NP thread form now on since im starting to really despise some of ya'll.
CiG
Approximately Infinite Universe
You missed my point. I'm not saying you're wrong about the sources being fine, I'm just disagreeing with your initial logic that it's hypocritical to have more trust for self-referential American articles while you doubt the objectivity of self-referential Russian articles.
Russia and America are definitely not on equal footing when it comes to pumping out propaganda and doctored information.
Russia and America are definitely not on equal footing when it comes to pumping out propaganda and doctored information.
H.P. Lovecraft
Active Member
No one here said they were, most of the basic info is fine, it's just some of that article from the one site seemed absurdly propagandistic. I don't trust the media in general anyhow, Western or otherwise.
Russian military technology is in some cases equal or superior to similar NATO technology. The S400 is a perfect example.
H.P. Lovecraft
Active Member
rms
Active Member
I knew arty Marine "boots were on the ground" yeah. Not surprised.
Edit:
http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/14/politics/us-russia-influence-libya/index.html
The pot getting mad at the kettle.
rms
Active Member
Well if only it wasn't the Army, and I haven't been in a protestant church except for funerals in like a decade.
rms
Active Member
7th Day Adventist. Big difference within Protestantism.
As one trying to return to service within a military medical capacity, I have some sympathies with the orientation. However, I have no issue with a weapon, as multiple expert rifle quals indicate.
Edit: The primary modern point is that although we can physically save many people at this point from total or partial physical incapacitation/death, there are mental considerations. This is within my area of interest.
As one trying to return to service within a military medical capacity, I have some sympathies with the orientation. However, I have no issue with a weapon, as multiple expert rifle quals indicate.
Edit: The primary modern point is that although we can physically save many people at this point from total or partial physical incapacitation/death, there are mental considerations. This is within my area of interest.
Last edited:
rms
Active Member
I'm about two days from going back in too. Got the results from the border patrol exam, maybe that'll keep me out.
Similar threads
