Dak
mentat
You are unaware of Lawfare. I'm not sure if you're off your anti-manic medication or what, but you have been more unhinged than normal lately.
The News Thread
- Thread starter Jimmy... Dead.
- Start date
TechnicalBarbarity
Poser Disposer
did you come up with that all by yourself(re SatansCamelToe)? Or are you mad because you clearly displayed your "intellectual" idiocy on that page? Anyway, mission accomplished. I lured you in like the pathetic, misinformed idiot you are. Oh and just go ahead and add unoriginal faggot to the list of labels i can tack onto you.
The Ozzman
Melted by feels
TechnicalBarbarity
Poser Disposer
Lol, without a doubt.
Biggest armchair intellectual on this forum. einherfag isnt too far behind either with his commie propaganda that he constantly spews forth.
Biggest armchair intellectual on this forum. einherfag isnt too far behind either with his commie propaganda that he constantly spews forth.
The Ozzman
Melted by feels
CiG
Harbinger of Metal
@HamburgerBoy surely intent supersedes accident when it comes to the law? Is someone who accidentally drowns a baby really a greater threat to society than someone who intentionally drowns a baby?
Last edited:
Nate Skalman
What’s in the basket?
Hugh Hefner is dead...that's cool!....anyway, yes- accorging to the law drowning a baby intentionally is worse. Morally? eh, the law doesn't go there. To be correct, intent does supersede accident in that case...look up: mens rea and actus reas. This is a sprawling topic that is VERY convoluted. Intentionally supersedes accidentally, hence the murder 1 charge vs manslaughter- big sentencing differences, too...here is a "cheat sheet"
Nate Skalman
What’s in the basket?
State "commonlaws" are the only cases where the court itself looks into 'morals'. Lawyers can argue the severity of a case, but "the law" is a middle entity who's whole job is to almost SEPARATE morals from the swaying of the law...good point, too because these are the same laws that stop liberals from being able to enforce feelings-based absurd laws onto everyone...that's why liberals seem to hate the constitution lol
Nate Skalman
What’s in the basket?
TechnicalBarbarity
Poser Disposer
UltimateApathy
Infinite Idiocy
Human filth promotes suffering because of "business":
https://www.yahoo.com/news/donald-trump-refuses-send-more-195456324.html
https://www.yahoo.com/news/donald-trump-refuses-send-more-195456324.html
Nate Skalman
What’s in the basket?
Question: why would they have to lift the Jones act to use our own US vessels in US waters? Something seems BS about that story. I know a little about Maritime law and understand having to lift it for Puerto Rico, but not for our own country...The Jones Act keeps shipping vessels to strict mechanical standards so that rusting, unmaintained vessels from third world countries don't sink or get stranded in our harbors, or allow foreign vessels to smuggle in whatever.
Nate Skalman
What’s in the basket?
@1:35
Yeeeaah...I used to hate rap back when I was young, somehow I still remember most of the lyrics and now I got a soft spot for 90's gangsta rap. My buddy got to see Suicidal Tendencies with Body Count last year...I'm still fucking jealous!!
TechnicalBarbarity
Poser Disposer
yeah same here, only rap i can stomach nowadays is the 90's west coast stuff and few old school artists from down south. "Roooolling down the streeet ...."
TechnicalBarbarity
Poser Disposer
Mort Divine
Shrine Maiden of the In-Crowd
Where did you get that I support Hillary Clinton? She's just another in a long line of neo-liberals that care more about lining her own pockets than the lives of the working class.
Mort Divine
Shrine Maiden of the In-Crowd
TechnicalBarbarity
Poser Disposer
Sanger believed that the United States should “keep the doors of immigration closed to the entrance of certain aliens whose condition is known to be detrimental to the stamina of the race, such as feebleminded, idiots, morons, Insane, syphilitic, epileptic, criminal, professional prostitutes, and others in this class barred by the immigration laws of 1924.” —“A Plan for Peace,” Birth Control Review, April 1932, pages 107-108
Sanger advocated “a stern and rigid policy of sterilization and segregation to that grade of population whose progeny is already tainted, or whose inheritance is such that objectionable traits may be transmitted to offspring.” —“A Plan for Peace,” Birth Control Review, April 1932, pages 107-108
People whom Sanger considered unfit, she wrote, should be sent to “farm lands and homesteads” where “they would be taught to work under competent instructors for the period of their entire lives.” —“A Plan for Peace,” Birth Control Review, April 1932, pages 107-108
“The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it,” she continued. —“Woman and the New Race,” 1920, Chapter 5: The Wickedness of Creating Large Families
“Birth control itself, often denounced as a violation of natural law, is nothing more or less than the facilitation of the process of weeding out the unfit, of preventing the birth of defectives or of those who will become defectives,” Sanger wrote. —“Woman and the New Race,” 1920, Chapter 18: The Goal
Population control, she wrote, would bring about the “materials of a new race.”
“If we are to develop in America a new race with a racial soul, we must keep the birth rate within the scope of our ability to understand as well as to educate. We must not encourage reproduction beyond our capacity to assimilate our numbers so as to make the coming generation into such physically fit, mentally capable, socially alert individuals as are the ideal of a democracy,” Sanger wrote. —“Woman and the New Race,” 1920, Chapter 3: The Materials of the New Race
“We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population,” Sanger wrote. —Letter to Dr. Clarence Gamble on Dec., 10, 1939
In an interview with Mike Wallace in 1957, Sanger said, “I think the greatest sin in the world is bringing children into the world, that have disease from their parents, that have no chance in the world to be a human being practically.”
“Delinquents, prisoners, all sorts of things just marked when they’re born. That to me is the greatest sin—that people can—can commit,” she said.
MARGARET SANGER = KILL ALL THE POOR PEOPLE
Oh and btw ...
Sanger advocated “a stern and rigid policy of sterilization and segregation to that grade of population whose progeny is already tainted, or whose inheritance is such that objectionable traits may be transmitted to offspring.” —“A Plan for Peace,” Birth Control Review, April 1932, pages 107-108
People whom Sanger considered unfit, she wrote, should be sent to “farm lands and homesteads” where “they would be taught to work under competent instructors for the period of their entire lives.” —“A Plan for Peace,” Birth Control Review, April 1932, pages 107-108
“The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it,” she continued. —“Woman and the New Race,” 1920, Chapter 5: The Wickedness of Creating Large Families
“Birth control itself, often denounced as a violation of natural law, is nothing more or less than the facilitation of the process of weeding out the unfit, of preventing the birth of defectives or of those who will become defectives,” Sanger wrote. —“Woman and the New Race,” 1920, Chapter 18: The Goal
Population control, she wrote, would bring about the “materials of a new race.”
“If we are to develop in America a new race with a racial soul, we must keep the birth rate within the scope of our ability to understand as well as to educate. We must not encourage reproduction beyond our capacity to assimilate our numbers so as to make the coming generation into such physically fit, mentally capable, socially alert individuals as are the ideal of a democracy,” Sanger wrote. —“Woman and the New Race,” 1920, Chapter 3: The Materials of the New Race
“We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population,” Sanger wrote. —Letter to Dr. Clarence Gamble on Dec., 10, 1939
In an interview with Mike Wallace in 1957, Sanger said, “I think the greatest sin in the world is bringing children into the world, that have disease from their parents, that have no chance in the world to be a human being practically.”
“Delinquents, prisoners, all sorts of things just marked when they’re born. That to me is the greatest sin—that people can—can commit,” she said.
MARGARET SANGER = KILL ALL THE POOR PEOPLE
Oh and btw ...
TechnicalBarbarity
Poser Disposer
That funny, i remember you saying something along the lines of "shes on the left, but shes not a liberal"
CiG
Harbinger of Metal
Similar threads
