The News Thread

The non-mystical parts of the Bible are actually considered relatively reliable sources of history. Obviously biased, but more detailed and comprehensive than a lot of the alternatives for the time. And Israel/Judah was an independent state for at least hundreds of years.

There is no country in existence than can be said to be definitively settled by its current inhabitants. Only a massive wuwuz would suggest otherwise.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prehistoric_Armenia


... thank you for linking me to a wikipedia page that says just that. Every name for every region, mountain and river there is an ancient Armenian(aka Hay) name. I guess all those historian must be "massive wuwuz's"
 
... thank you for linking me to a wikipedia page that says just that. Every name for every region, mountain and river there is an ancient Armenian(aka Hay) name. I guess all those historian must be "massive wuwuz's"

You realize you literally cited a mythological date nearly 2000 years earlier prior to Armenia's existence in the historical record, right?
 
Im guessing you have never heard of Hayk(who the country of Hayastan is named after btw) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hayk or Urartu? What about the Areni 1 Cave Complex which is where the they found the worlds first winery and first shoe?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Areni-1_cave

But yes, im getting sick and tired of holding your hand. "HEY LOOK AT MY WIKIPEDIA ARTICLES, BUT YOUR WIKIPEDIA ARTICLES ARE WRONG" :lol:
 
Hayk the Great (Armenian: Հայկ), Armenian pronunciation: [hajk], or The Great Hayk, also known as Hayk Nahapet (Հայկ Նահապետ, Armenian pronunciation: [hajk nahapɛt], Hayk the "head of family" or patriarch[1]), is the legendary patriarch and founder of the Armenian nation.

the legendary patriarch and founder of the Armenian nation

legendary

A ruler attested to exist by a historian 2000 years after the fact.

WE WUZ THE FIRST WHITE PEOPLE
 
Now you are questioning historians? :lol: You do realize there is no written history in detail if we got that back? In almost ANY culture, right? And yes history WAS and IS written by historians you nitwit. That's how it works. There are ancient Armenian writings in a bunch of areas that go way back, including that one link of the Areni Cave complex that you just so happened to ignore.

Also this ...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hayasa-Azzi
two Armenian kingdoms, one named after HAYK ... thousands of years before that "fake historian"(fake, amirite?) you are talking about even walked this planet.

You also ignored this
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kura–Araxes_culture
2400 B.C every historic name is Armenian
 
The similarity of the name Hayasa to the endonym of the Armenians, Hayk or Hay and the Armenian name for Armenia, Hayastan has prompted the suggestion that the Hayasa-Azzi confereration was involved in the Armenian ethnogenesis. The term Hayastan bears resemblance to the ancient Mesopotamian god Haya (ha-ià) and another western deity called Ebla Hayya, related to the god Ea (Enki or Enkil in Sumerian, Ea in Akkadian and Babylonian).[15] Thus, the Great Soviet Encyclopedia of 1962 posited that the Armenians derive from a migration of Hayasa into Shupria in the 12th century BC.[dubious – discuss][16] This is open to objection due to the possibility of a mere coincidental similarity between the two names[17] and the lack of geographic overlap, although Hayasa (the region) became known as Lesser Armenia (Pokr Hayastan in modern Armenian) in coming centuries.

The mentioning of the name Armenian can only be securely dated to the 6th century BC with the Orontid kings and very little is known specifically about the people of Azzi-Hayasa per se.[18] The most recent edition of Encyclopædia Britannica does not include any articles on Hayasa or Azzi-Hayasa likely due to the paucity of historical documentation about this kingdom's people. Britannica's article on the Armenians confirms that they were descendents of a branch of the Indo-European peoples but makes no assertion that they formed any portion of the population of Azzi-Hayasa.[19]

Nevertheless, a minority of historians theorize that after the Phrygian invasion of Hittites, the hypothetically named Armeno-Phrygians would have settled in Hayasa-Azzi, and merged with the local people, who were possibly already spread within the western regions of Urartu.[20]

In other words, largely speculation because there's so little to go on, and because so many tribes likely came and went in those days.
 
HBB: FUCK THE HISTORY THAT IS WRITTEN BY HISTORIANS :lol:

Oh and btw, i come form this part of Yerevan(aka one of the oldest inhabited cities on this planet, but fuck that, what do the historians know, right?)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shengavit_Settlement. Again, those are all historic Armenian names and it is in the center of the historic capital of Yerevan. But yeah, lets just ignore those dates, BECAUSE THEY WERE WRITTEN BY HISTORIANS RIGHT? PSHHHH HISTORIANS? WHAT HISTORIANS? Lulz

Again, i have annihilated you in every single thing you have dared to talk about today and youre still trying to find escape routes ... but they're just not working for you :lol:
 
What are historic Armenian names? Are you saying there were signs/plaques/etc in the Armenian language found at those sites?
 
SMH, helpless. No more free education for you. Im not giving you history lessons anymore unless you start sending money to my paypal account.

If I discover ancient ruins in California and name them the Amerifat Burger Bald Eagle ruins, is it proof that Anglo-Saxon settlers founded civilization in California?