I'm inferring based on what evidence we have, you're psychoanalyzing the guy based on the history of racism in America.
So did you happen to talk to Aubrey before he went "jogging" that day or are you just echoing what his lawyer and the media are feeding you? And did you miss the post from HBB where there were numerous videos that showed him trespassing .... where the property owners also said they had things stolen? Looks like the only person whos having things put into their mind here is you. Oh and CIG never said he was "trying to kill whities".
posting gifs when you have nothing to refute facts seems to be your go to move lately
We're both psychoanalyzing. Would be great if Arbery were still alive and we could ask him. Too bad...
how many times are you going to ask me to repeat what I've already stated? Why is a state actively encouraging regular citizens to know enough about the law to 1. diagnose a situation as well as a trained professional (law enforcement) and 2. legally justify lethal force in defense of 1.What makes it a garbage law?
Where they not supposed to "think of their guns" when making a citizens arrest?
I hope you see the contradiction in these two quotes. By "thinking of their guns" when making a citizens arrest, they were clearly using firearms to enforce their citizens arrest, which is exactly my point. Two dudes actively brought, and intended to use their lethal weapons if they deemed necessary. For fucking trespassing.You acting like they automatically had it out to kill the dude is ignorant and mindnumbingly retarded.
who gives a fuck what either side has said? The case needs neither side's statement on anything.instead well believe what the black "joggers" family, lawyers and the sharpton lynch mob have told us.
If i thought someone was committing a robbery in my neighborhood and wanted to get some answers only to be attacked and have some try and take my gun away then you better believe that he is going to get shot. I
Yes, and with this example you will hopefully understand the difference between self preservation and legality.If you had a gun and i tried to take it from you(regardless of the situation ... which we dont agree on), would you not shoot me?
Where the fuck do you think the truck was you dummy?You're acting as if they rolled up on him from out the fucking shadows lmao.
how many times are you going to ask me to repeat what I've already stated? Why is a state actively encouraging regular citizens to know enough about the law to 1. diagnose a situation as well as a trained professional (law enforcement) and 2. legally justify lethal force in defense of 1.
I hope you see the contradiction in these two quotes.
who gives a fuck what either side has said? The case needs neither side's statement on anything.
you didn't defend your shitty homeland nor this country, so quit acting like you would do anything, ever. You're a wack mother fucker who is scared to do what's necessary. Which is why you spend all your day talking tough to internet dwellers on a fucking obscure metal board.
Yes, and with this example you will hopefully understand the difference between self preservation and legality.
Where the fuck do you think the truck was you dummy?
how many times are you going to ask me to repeat what I've already stated? Why is a state actively encouraging regular citizens to know enough about the law to 1. diagnose a situation as well as a trained professional (law enforcement) and 2. legally justify lethal force in defense of 1.
my point was that they usually grill any white person that shoots a black man, regardless of the cause. Cop shoots a black man and its the end of the world, especially if the cops white. White man shoot black man, PULL OUT DA PITCHFORKS. Black cops shoots black/white man? psshh who cares. Black person kills white person? Eh whatever. Yea, this whole thing is 100% about race and these spineless lackeys like rms, ein, krow etc who don't(or pretend not to) see it and actually encourage that type of behavior should truly be ashamed of themselves.I think it would be a bit different; any perp that punches and grabs the gun of a cop is definitely getting shot, and the outrage isn't usually *this* high. If the white guys in the video were cops, and the truck was a police vehicle, and a burglar ran directly at them and tried attacking them, most would just say the jogger was crazy, with a bit of "He was unarmed! Shoulda used tazers first!" outrage from the usual suspects. This lynching narrative is being pushed by idpol communist leftists as well as boot-licking thin-blue-line Republican shills, because individuals exercising their power and rights over their neighborhood scares those in government.
But I agree that the outrage is basically all about race.
Lmao, the amount of misinformation and retardation showcased in every one of those statements is hilarious. Only form you baby, only from you. I hope you never change, i love it.
posting gifs when you have nothing to refute facts seems to be your go to move lately
Where the fuck do you think the truck was you dummy?