The San Francisco Police Department says they've made an arrest after a free speech rally and protest against Twitter turned violent on Saturday.
Around 12:20 p.m. on Saturday, Philip Anderson, the main event organizer, told officers he was participating in a free speech rally at UN Plaza when he was punched in the face by an unknown suspect. The assault caused him to lose two teeth.
If Biden isn't sunk at this point this is just another point towards the total worthlessness of the entire moneyed journalistic endeavor in the US. All of the complaining about Trump's mental health and Trump being a "threat to national security", and the "cure" is to elect someone with some sort of blatantly obvious advanced neurodegenerative disease and completely compromised by the main near-peer threat. Could an improvement to Trump be installed as the executive head? Absolutely. Biden ain't it, and neither is Kamala.
I'm amazed by the disparity in perception. As far as I can tell, Biden's mental acuity is no worse than Trump's. He certainly isn't suffering from a "blatantly obvious advanced neurodegenerative disease"--again, no more than Trump is. As far as I can tell, the reason Trump resonates so well with his hardcore base is that his rhetoric appeals to the most reductively simplistic kind of folk psychology. Or in other words, people don't like to think too hard, and so Trump sounds great.
Biden's no better when it comes to critical thinking; but I see no evidence that he's worse. I'd be curious to hear your sources, and your reasons for disbelieving sources I'd cite. I have a feeling that your distrust of media informs any arguments in favor of Biden; but then I'm not sure why the sources you'd appeal to are any better.
tl;dr, I'm suspicious of your ability to argue effectively that Biden's mental acuity is poorer than Trump's.
I have a relative in a somewhat worse clinical disposition than Biden, but obviously receiving care to a far less degree in quality. No need to call "lids" though of course, since they don't have any debate demands. It's sad. If, in estimating the cognitive difference between Biden and Trump, you can't surmise a cognitive difference, or even think that Biden is doing better health wise, you should strongly reconsider the quality of the evidence or education you have on the matter.
It's too bad you aren't sharing any evidence to consider. Unless you're treating him in the room, I'm not sure what kind of privileged perspective you have. Sorry.
I don't see anything qualitative in media sources that would leave me to believe Biden is worse than Trump.
Publicly available videos a
from the last 5-10 years are evidence of his cognitive decline. If you don't think so that's willful.
This isn't an argument. Maybe you're willfully ignoring the extent of Trump's cognitive decline. Where is the qualitative comparison? What about videos of Trump over the last 5-10 years?
You can't claim "fake news" and also claim empirical authority when your evidence is comprised of media sources.
So Kamala Harris and the Democrats' big plan to oppose the new supreme court pick was for 10 of the 12 Democrats to boycott it, leaving the Republicans completely unopposed?
Seems kinda galaxy brained to me.
It's just bad faith when Biden supporters pretend like Biden hasn't experienced cognitive decline. Some Republicans do go too far with it and act like he has full blown late stage dementia. However, homeboy has clearly lost a step mentally, and I dread to see where he'll be come 2024.
As for Trump, he's much sharper for his age. I think he's delusional, but I think that has more to do with being a rich, narcissistic asshole who has had people kissing his ass his entire life.
I didn't say Trump hasn't had a decline. He's past 70, pretty much anyone is going to have cognitive decline by then, especially subsisting on shitty food. If you look at videos of him from 20 years ago he isn't as sharp or articulate. But Biden has shown a sharp decline from even 2 years ago, and simply looking at Biden conversing isn't exactly depending on the "news".
It's virtue signaling, like everything the Democrats do. They don't actually want to fight for anything. They could have done a ton of things to delay this vote, but they chose not to. Honestly, I think some of them want her on the court because then they have an excuse for the rest of their careers to do nothing. "I know you elected me to fight for issue X, but the Supreme Court would knock it down anyway. Nothing we could do!"