HamburgerBoy
Active Member
- Sep 16, 2007
- 15,042
- 4,850
- 113
Biden has snubbed the progs so many times that I can't imagine he'll put many of them in his cabinet. The progs are just as fake and confused as the right-wing pops anyways. They'll make some noise about M4A and whatever but the second a black man ODs in police custody they get flashbacks to their junior high civil rights history lessons and go into selfless white savior mode. Also explains why polls tend to show Trump's support a
That's the ostensible reason Kamala Harris was picked for VP, after all (though the real reason is almost certainly her deep connections with the Silicon Valley cabal).
You misread me. I'm saying that Trump is tolerating riots to a degree Obama never did. Obama tried to pass gun regulations but the Republican Senate and NRA cockblocked him every step; no one stopped Trump's bumpstock ban, nor has Trump pushed back on the ATF unilaterally declaring pistol grips on semi-auto rifles illegal. With Biden in the WH the Senate Reps will almost certainly go back on the offense and reel in that big blue-presidency gun-money again.
I agree on a fundamental level, Congress is absolutely busted by design. The powers Congress currently has over states far exceeds anything intended under the Constitution as written which means that today the sub-10% approval rating is perfectly understandable when ones' elected leaders only possess a tiny fraction of the power needed to exact beneficial changes. Only a true Realignment(tm) can change things, an 1816/1861/1933/1964 moment that destroys one side and allows something new, totally not this pussy-ass 2016 "Republican populism" hoax of flipping a few blue states red by 100k votes.
Maybe you haven't realized the trillions already spent by a bi-partisan consensus this year over a meme virus. If there's one thing Congress can get together on, it's spending shittons of money, particularly on things that inflate the kinds of assets that the rich and powerful hold. Trump might go native through his seeming-lameduck remainder, but once he's out of the way and perhaps stocks are allowed to crash for one more big consolidation buy-up, it will be QE as usual, just as it was through Obama's entire presidency (in which Republicans held the Senate 6 out of 8 years).
Rioting is almost entirely committed by subversives and felons though as a branch of the Democratic anarcho-tyranny enforcement branch, bailing out Boeing and the airlines for the third(?) time this year and saving a few janitorial jobs won't do anything to calm them. Unemployment is still falling pretty quickly in most non-retarded states afaik.
That's the ostensible reason Kamala Harris was picked for VP, after all (though the real reason is almost certainly her deep connections with the Silicon Valley cabal).
What policy do think Biden wants to pass to allow more riots? That makes no sense. He'll crack protester's skulls, just like Obama did.
Gun regulations... sure, if you're opposed to those it's a good thing. You're obviously to the right of me, so I get it. That said, I don't think it's good for our legislative branch to continue down this path of doing nothing. It would be better if they actually did their job, and if people were unsatisfied with the result, they voted to replace them. Instead what we have is a bunch of game playing piled upon decades of inaction from congress. It's toxic to our democracy.
You misread me. I'm saying that Trump is tolerating riots to a degree Obama never did. Obama tried to pass gun regulations but the Republican Senate and NRA cockblocked him every step; no one stopped Trump's bumpstock ban, nor has Trump pushed back on the ATF unilaterally declaring pistol grips on semi-auto rifles illegal. With Biden in the WH the Senate Reps will almost certainly go back on the offense and reel in that big blue-presidency gun-money again.
I agree on a fundamental level, Congress is absolutely busted by design. The powers Congress currently has over states far exceeds anything intended under the Constitution as written which means that today the sub-10% approval rating is perfectly understandable when ones' elected leaders only possess a tiny fraction of the power needed to exact beneficial changes. Only a true Realignment(tm) can change things, an 1816/1861/1933/1964 moment that destroys one side and allows something new, totally not this pussy-ass 2016 "Republican populism" hoax of flipping a few blue states red by 100k votes.
I realize being an adult child leaves you rather blind to how many people have lost their jobs/businesses from the pandemic, but for at least the next two years most sane people would prioritize un-gridlocking pandemic relief in Congress over keeping in check "radical excesses" that are relatively minuscule in scale/severity. Which, by the way, would actually cut down on rioting since there'd be fewer unemployed people.
Maybe you haven't realized the trillions already spent by a bi-partisan consensus this year over a meme virus. If there's one thing Congress can get together on, it's spending shittons of money, particularly on things that inflate the kinds of assets that the rich and powerful hold. Trump might go native through his seeming-lameduck remainder, but once he's out of the way and perhaps stocks are allowed to crash for one more big consolidation buy-up, it will be QE as usual, just as it was through Obama's entire presidency (in which Republicans held the Senate 6 out of 8 years).
Rioting is almost entirely committed by subversives and felons though as a branch of the Democratic anarcho-tyranny enforcement branch, bailing out Boeing and the airlines for the third(?) time this year and saving a few janitorial jobs won't do anything to calm them. Unemployment is still falling pretty quickly in most non-retarded states afaik.