HamburgerBoy
Active Member
- Sep 16, 2007
- 15,042
- 4,723
- 113
He was actually an atheist and Berniebro fwiw
I haven't read this, and can't seem to verify either.
But admittedly, I haven't read that he's a Christian either. I was mostly punning on his last name. That said, Nazism has a historically conflicted relationship with Christianity, usually advocating Christian values while not officially endorsing it. The vast majority of people in Germany in the 1930s were Christian, so it makes sense that Nazism as a political and cultural force viewed itself as amenable with Christianity, if it wanted ze support of ze Guhman people.
For my part, I view Nazism (historically speaking) as a Christian-friendly political system, and one that promoted Christian antipathy toward Jews.
He wasn't a Nazi though and I haven't seen anything where he claimed to be. He was a self-identified libertarian socialist nihilist (probably some other stuff as well). His stated motive in the protest where he gave Nazi salutes was to promote "true" freedom of speech.
"Libertarian socialist" he was a fucking confused twat in that case.
I believe Christian is actually his first name.
This archives a few of his posts:
http://heavy.com/news/2017/05/jeremy-christians-facebook-page-racist/2/
I don't really care whether he claimed to be or not. If being allowed to sieg heil constitutes free speech, and he had no problem giving that salute, then I'm calling him a Nazi (or neo Nazi, whatever). If identity is obligatory and not selective (which is basically my entire beef with identity politics), then that means it doesn't matter whether he identifies as Nazi or not. What matters the role he performs.
If he has no problem with the salute, and even gives it, then he's a Nazi--or at the very least, a Nazi sympathizer. And in this case I can't say that there looks to be much difference.
He did it in the context of both Trump supporters and ANTIFA yelling at him, with police guiding him away. He also explicitly claimed to not be a racist in his online postings. Further, he threatened to kill anyone that touched him including cops during the April protest, and in the stabbing the victims were not Muslim but in fact white guys intervening; from the evidence it seems more plausible that he was some kind of extreme troll's rights proponent and perhaps tried the self-defense/NAP argument if one of them touched him. There's literally no evidence of him actually supporting racist views except perhaps anti-Semitic ones (which were always in an anti-Zionist context).
I mean, if a sieg heil is all it takes to label one a Nazi...
Eh, I'm sorry but the fact that he was directing his comments on the train toward Muslims based on appearance, and making assumptions as to their legal status... he was racist. That's the only plausible explanation that I see. Racists almost always claim to not be racist. I'll admit that he may not have been Christian though, or be identifiable as Christian in any significant way.
Are you saying that perhaps he verbally ranted at two young Muslim women, who then left as the white guys perhaps accosted him in defence of the young women and then he stabbed them in self-defense?
No such thing as a black Nazi, but most assuredly there are black, brown and yellow Nazi sympathizers. The Protocols of the Elders of Zion is a commonly shared document among radical Islamists for example.
Anti-Semitism brings together the most unlikely of peoples.
But anyway I'm inclined to agree with @Einherjar86 here, he definitely seems to be a racist, especially stylistically of the more extreme elements within the alt-right. His Facebook rants are basically identical to tons of debates I've personally had with self-identifying alt-rightists.