From watching the games this sounds corrects. You can get a lot of Fenway doubles off the monster or wierd hits down either baseline. Not to mention the ones that go to the triangle in centerBigger than CB Park in Philly, I think.
I haven't looked at any hit charts or stats or anything to back it up, but I think the general consensus on Fenway Park is that it is a hitters park, but not a homerun hitters park. Fewer balls fly out of Fenway than you'd expect, but the dimensions allow a ton of base hits, which makes for a lot of extended rallies. Again, though, I don't have anything concrete to back that up.
Colorado. And Texas, kinda.
What about Cincinnati?
Coors Field in Colorado is huge, buddy.
what? that ballpark is notorious for the homerun. they were talking about how Matt Holiday's numbers were exaggerated, so he might not win MVP. Dont remember who won, wasnt it Rollins?
Not to mention the ones that go to the triangle in center
Yes, Coors is known for homers, but we're talking about how the size of ball parks impacts hitting. Coors is very big but allows a lot of homers due to the thin air.
Mathiäs;6707441 said:Up until this year it was a launching pad. This year, however, they began storing the balls in some sort of 'humidity room', so the team ERA dropped a ton and there were much fewer homers. I know this because every time the Giants played the Rocks that was the most popular topic of discussion.
Coors is still a great hitters' park because of all the room out there for extra base hits.
Wrigley is usually overestimated as a hitters' park. It's 355 and 353 down the lines, which I believe are the longest lines in the majors. I always hate seeing those dinky 320 foot pop-ups go for homers at Fenway and Yankee Stadium. The power alleys are a short 368 at Wrigley though. Then center is a standard 400. People forget that the wind is blowing in well over half the time, and the grass is cut long.