Do you think?
If one considers that his conversational or argumentative style appears to be somewhat negatively self-serving - he denies implying something purely because it is easy to do so.
One can continue to imply a position and whence countered, can continue to deny taking that position.....for example, continually referring to an 'ignorant and retarded' post doesn't make it so - it is in itself an opinion, and the fact that the person in question explained the tone of the post perfectly legitimately doesn't matter of course - one simply changes position slightly, (often contradicting oneself) which in his mind further justifies his argument.
Sadly, this kind of mental foible points to either a previous injury (physical or emotional) or simply maladjustment - which has multiple and varied causation - one being childhood trauma.
At the end of the day, I couldn't really care less about Mr.Vikernes.....and I only took up the argument because
Mr.Maladjustment came across as a complete arsehole, instead of just having a larf, like the very next poster did.