agreed... it's a misunderstood quote. he was just referring to any compressor or limiter with a side chain function (not specifically the L1).
i think he was just examining the 'L1 trick' for the sake of quoting the "topic".
but it's difficult to be sure since i can only read what ermin wrote and not what everyone else was saying. i will also give ermin the benefit of the doubt and say that i am sure he knows the L1 has no key input or side chain.
this quote is completely taken out of context and is just inferring the use of side chain in a overhead/snare situation.
i still don't see how this has been discussed by as many people as clint is saying.
clint, just because you misread one person implying the common use of a signal processor doesn't mean it's been discussed numerous times.
i will, of course concede if you can show me where anyone else has exclaimed the use of this "trick" and as well it to be legendary, other than yourself.
otherwise, this thread is just perpetuating a distraction against what is actually true and preventing the "ideas" (that you cherish) to expand and are becoming lost in confusion.
facts for anyone who reaches this thread:
waves L1 limiter does not have a side chain function however it can be used to subdue snare transients. after you have employed a healthy amount of gain reduction to the overheads and snare, the theory would then be to apply a compressor with a side chain function after the limiter in the overhead chain (channel). finally you would side chain the snare to the overheads in an effort to duck the original snare captured with the overhead mics. thus allowing the more desired snare drum to sit tastefully in the mix without any unwanted artifacts from the original snare drum.
If its a 'misunderstood quote' then why does he still mention side chaining a limiter! Thats why he isn't excluding the L1. He just said limiters, and we all know Ermz, he would of said not the L1 if he meant it!