Dhatura said:The problem with this soulmate thing is that yes, it's connected to sex and love. If it wasn't, I guess people could hold on to their soulmates for a lifetime.
I mean it's not a problem it just fucks up things.
So what's the point in having this term soulmate at all?
Strangelight said:Why do girls always say that sex fucks things up? I'll admit Ive actually agreed with girls who've said that to me, but I didnt really agree, I just said that to look all sensitive and that
Anyway, yeah, why do they say that? Fairytales and shit?
Strangelight said:"It was like riding through the clouds on a winged horse at sunset with my soulmate, things can never be the same now"
Strangelight said:Why do girls always say that sex fucks things up? I'll admit Ive actually agreed with girls who've said that to me, but I didnt really agree, I just said that to look all sensitive and that
Anyway, yeah, why do they say that? Fairytales and shit?
"It was like riding through the clouds on a winged horse at sunset with my soulmate, things can never be the same now"
toolsofthetrade said:it's easier to be a guest than being a host.
Dhatura said:No, no, no, I'm totally misunderstood here. So, let's suppose there's "friendship" between a boy and a girl (that's me). Until I start to feel I'd like to hmm, jump on the boy, like physically, I have no problem with the boy-girl friendship. But when this physicality comes into the picture -- and it does only when I fall in love with the person -- then it's all fucked up because
a) the person doesn't want me for a girlfriend
b) the person does want me for a girlfriend but he wouldn't tell me cause he doesn't dare and the whole thing just falls through
c) the person does want me for a girlfriend and even tells me (well, this has not happened to me that often, haha), and we even become lovers (well, this has happened to me even less often), and then somehow, after a good while, the person just falls out of love with me and I get fucked up, cause it seems once I'm really in love I can't really fall out of love that easily, and drastic solutions hurt.
So it's just the opposite. Whenever I fall in love I always want to get physically close, so I could say that's a sign that things turn sorta serious. So, yes, sexual attraction does not fuck up things but it signals that things will get fucked up, hehe, cause I'm lost, and sorrow will come in due time.
Now what really puzzles me is how come that I fall in love with someone's intelligence and sense of humour and then start to crave for his body. This is really intriguing, more so because it doesn't make any sense. :Spin:
And about that soulmate thing. I can't imagine any soulmate for me with whom I wouldn't like to have sex. That's why I said "soulmate" as such (without sex) is bullshit, it's just lovers and that's it. Well, okay, for me being "soulmates" is important to develop physicality, but still, the term becomes redundant in the end.
mehdi.i.e.e.e said:soulmates go to the pub together and drink canada dry while dissing everyone they know. well thats my vision of a soulmate.
Strangelight said:Ah yeah, I get what you mean, but why do the rest of them say sex fucks things up?
Do you think casual sex is bad? I do and I dont, I have a proper paradox goin on there like. The Devil says 'go on chuck it up her arse' and God says 'ah come on, you know you will feel guilty if you do'.
Oh, this is about soulmates.. erm yeh just a posh word for bume wanters
Dhatura said:I would do that with you and have fun, does that make us soulmates?
Dhatura said:To tell the truth, I never got it chucked up my arse casually, somehow I don't feel like it, or maybe I'm just afraid. But no, I just don't feel like it with someone I'm not in love with, and I don't even have a conscience so that's not the reason.
Dora said:i need love too. but love can be temporary.. one night like
Dhatura said:No, no, no, I'm totally misunderstood here. So, let's suppose there's "friendship" between a boy and a girl (that's me). Until I start to feel I'd like to hmm, jump on the boy, like physically, I have no problem with the boy-girl friendship. But when this physicality comes into the picture -- and it does only when I fall in love with the person -- then it's all fucked up because
a) the person doesn't want me for a girlfriend
b) the person does want me for a girlfriend but he wouldn't tell me cause he doesn't dare and the whole thing just falls through
c) the person does want me for a girlfriend and even tells me (well, this has not happened to me that often, haha), and we even become lovers (well, this has happened to me even less often), and then somehow, after a good while, the person just falls out of love with me and I get fucked up, cause it seems once I'm really in love I can't really fall out of love that easily, and drastic solutions hurt.
So it's just the opposite. Whenever I fall in love I always want to get physically close, so I could say that's a sign that things turn sorta serious. So, yes, sexual attraction does not fuck up things but it signals that things will get fucked up, hehe, cause I'm lost, and sorrow will come in due time.
Now what really puzzles me is how come that I fall in love with someone's intelligence and sense of humour and then start to crave for his body. This is really intriguing, more so because it doesn't make any sense. :Spin:
And about that soulmate thing. I can't imagine any soulmate for me with whom I wouldn't like to have sex. That's why I said "soulmate" as such (without sex) is bullshit, it's just lovers and that's it. Well, okay, for me being "soulmates" is important to develop physicality, but still, the term becomes redundant in the end.
Su Jacko said:I understand what you're saying, esp the bit about falling for the person then the physical side just clics. One day mates, the next day...mmm
However, I do think you can be close to someone, soulmate close, without sex. There may have been attraction there once but you've moved past it somehow, maybe it's a time thing, or you just stop fancying them or the roving eye and just have a mate instead.