Why is the metalness of Black Sabbath questioned but not 80s Priest or Dio?

I Witness - 3.5/5
Cross of Thorns - 3.5/5
Cloak And Dagger - 3/5 (bonus track, bluesy with a Thin Lizzy shuffle, apparently a Headless Cross leftover, makes sense)
Loser Gets It All - 3/5 (bonus track, Forbidden leftover? groove riff should hurt it but doesn't because there's a nice apprehensive feeling over it, song ends abruptly and feels incomplete but still a lot of potential)
Dying For Love - 2.5/5 (half-ballad thing)
Virtual Death - 2/5 (doomy song, would be better if not for some blatant recycling)
Immaculate Deception - 2/5
Back To Eden - 2/5 (good chorus, lame everything else)
The Hand That Rocks The Cradle - 2/5 (Back to Eden, sans good chorus, but with a good bridge)
Psychophobia - 2/5
What's the Use - 1.5/5 (bonus track, the vocal melody is basically note-for-note something circa Dio period, lighter speedier riff)
Cardinal Sin - 1.5/5 (Kashmir meets Dio Sabbath, tries way too hard)
Evil Eye - 0.5/5 (dumb basic groove, longest song too)
 
He thinks Obscura is a death metal album at all.
says the guy who's beyond delusional when it comes to metal subgenres.

200.gif
 
Because it's technical nu metal, this is a well-established fact in my delusional peabrain
*fixed

Exactly. It's why I'm trolling 90% of the time.
I'm pretty sure you were lying anyway. There's just no way a simpleton like you can digest an album like Obscura.


Mudvayne formed in 1996, Korn formed in 1993, Obscura was written and finished by December 1993.
he's unintentionally trolling you and you just keep feeding him, lol.