will good DA really affect the way i track??

rispsira

Member
Mar 18, 2010
808
0
16
Ill try to explain my question as much as possible, and then the reason why im asking!

How much will the DA affect the way i TRACK (not mix)? i mean with better DA i expect to have perhaps a better reproduction of what i already did, and perhaps more warmth depending on the unit. But will it really affect my mic placement? wont the representation of the frequencies still be the same?

I wont be doing the mixing myself and I was considering the HEDD 192 for the tape emulation and it has DA as well. But if the DA wont be that improtant for tracking maybe i can buy the BURL B2 AD for less and have good quality conversion with some analog tape warmth (of course from what i have read..) then the engineer mixing it can use his DA conversion.

That way i save some money and get really good AD with the BURL.

M i thinking right?
 
thanks for the reply abt!

im leaning twd going that route (burl B2 AD only for tracking). thanks for your opinion

Anyone wanna disagree? :goggly:
 
Keep in mind also that your D/A is only going to be as good as your room and your monitors. Getting some crazy-good D/A is wasted money if the aforementioned elements aren't great to begin with.
 
Thanks guys. I realize that about treatment etc and we have that covered. Good point about the reamping by the way. But though i will have DA tracks for safety, i will probably rerecord rather than reamp.

Any more opinions?

Thanks
 
a DA is nothing more than a summing amp, a couple of resistors tied to the same input of an op amp, unless the DA was made from cheap Chinese components the difference from a cheaper DA to a more expensive DA will be extremely tiny and just generally unnoticeable. Spend your money on better monitors, room acoustics etc.
 
How much will the DA affect the way i TRACK (not mix)? i mean with better DA i expect to have perhaps a better reproduction of what i already did, and perhaps more warmth depending on the unit. But will it really affect my mic placement? wont the representation of the frequencies still be the same?

I wont be doing the mixing myself and I was considering the HEDD 192 for the tape emulation and it has DA as well. But if the DA wont be that improtant for tracking maybe i can buy the BURL B2 AD for less and have good quality conversion with some analog tape warmth (of course from what i have read..) then the engineer mixing it can use his DA conversion.

That way i save some money and get really good AD with the BURL.

M i thinking right?

How would you use the HEDD 192 DA in the context of recording?

Are you going to run audio through it or use it for your monitoring?

A DA will get sound out of a DAW
A AD will get sound into a DAW

Converter quality can make a noticeable difference, but then so does a bunch of other stuff. What's the weakest link in your chain?
 
How would you use the HEDD 192 DA in the context of recording?

Are you going to run audio through it or use it for your monitoring?

A DA will get sound out of a DAW
A AD will get sound into a DAW

Converter quality can make a noticeable difference, but then so does a bunch of other stuff. What's the weakest link in your chain?

Thanks for the reply!

The DA should be used for monitoring what i recorded in th eDAW already to give me a taste of what i really recorded. Its just that i havent really been convinced that the QUALiTY of the DA will affect my mic position for example or the way i track in general. but then again i am no sound engineer.. so i might be wrong.

I beleive that i have the rest of the chain covered for recording (can give you the details if you need it) just not sure if i shoyuld spend extra for DA (hedd. also has ad) or just get a good AD (burl AD)

or if you guys have any other advice..

Thanks again!
 
Personally, when I upgraded to even my medium range AD/DA RME unit, the difference was subtle, but I could notice it for sure. That being said, it hasn't neccessarily affected my micing too much etc just makes me a little more aware of the spectrum I have to work with overall!

I hope that makes sense :)
 
Everything in your chain from the mic all the way to the speaker is going to affect everything you do. That being said, the AD/DA I would definitely put in the last 10% category and most recordings have much bigger problems (acoustics, source sound, etc.).

But, when I upgraded my DA by modding out one from MCM Electronics, I noticed a pretty big difference. Things like all of a sudden I could hear MP3 compression @256Kbps and up that I couldn't hear before! Vocals that sounded nasally, all sorts of lower midrange issues. This is in a pretty well treated room as well with pretty decent monitors (Dyn. BM5A's, and Yamaha HS80M).

I am not sure it helped me much tracking. Maybe with some mic aiming, but only slightly. But definitely mixing, it really helped with the fine tuning.

It really is a tragedy on my wallet that I can hear a difference. Now I want a better DA and a better AD. Ugh...
 
Sorry about the late reply. been thinking about what you guys habe been saying; not sure what to do yet.

But pretty sure im over-thinking the whole thing. In the end i guess with any of those products i can get a good recording with some help from a good enginner.

Thank you all for your posts!
 
a DA is nothing more than a summing amp, a couple of resistors tied to the same input of an op amp, unless the DA was made from cheap Chinese components the difference from a cheaper DA to a more expensive DA will be extremely tiny and just generally unnoticeable. Spend your money on better monitors, room acoustics etc.

So are you suggesting that if i open up a top end DA i'll only find that? Yes ok you CAN make one from those, in the same way that you can make a low pass with a variable capacitor to earth. Doesn't mean that it will produce the best results