Most retarded post I've seen in a while.
Balance of powers + mild-as-hell politicians = my life will be virtually
identicle regardless of which one of these people-pleasing career politicians sits in the oval office. It's called priorities, broseph. Even if someone like Ron Paul got elected, someone who wants to make serious changes (not the mild policy adjustments of Mr. Obama), most likely very little actual change would occur due to the balance of powers.
What happens with the war doesn't significantly change my life. My lifestyle is recession-proof. The slight difference in my life based on different taxes will go unnoticed by me. Call me apathetic, call me a bastard, but you can't say I'm not thinking logically and adequately looking out for my interests. Others may decide that a different path is better, but no one can say that there is a path that better follows
my priorities and desires.
Obama's not going to turn the country communist. Nor is McCain. Nor would Biden or Palin. Even if I chose to waste energy throwing support behind either one of these cookie-cutter choices, half of the country believes the other one will do a better job. I don't agree with the partisan bullshit that says your party is superior and intelligent while the other party is retarded and will destroy the world. If my guy loses, the other guy will do a pretty adequate job just the same. I don't pretend to be Stephen Hawking or any genius, I'm not the magical person who knows everything (and can tell the future of what the candidates will
actually do regardless of their election platform). What I mean by this is, if half the country wants the other guy in office, even if my guy is "better" the other guy will probably do a job comparable in its level of goodness. If the day comes that half the country is brainwashed and voting for the reanimated corpse of Hitler, perhaps I'll vote for President. Until then, it's really not pertinent.