live bootlegs ... not bad quality ... from Operation 2
http://www.queensryche.com/releases/operation-mindcrime-2/paraphernalia.html
http://www.queensryche.com/releases/operation-mindcrime-2/paraphernalia.html
What you are saying it just a bunch of crap, "plain and simple".General Zod said:Not going to listen. Not even when the CD comes out. This is a money grab, plain and simple. Remaking this disc now, without Chris, is heresy.
Zod
General Zod said:Not going to listen. Not even when the CD comes out. This is a money grab, plain and simple. Remaking this disc now, without Chris, is heresy.
Zod
You are clueless. Plus you dont even know what you are talking about. Plus what you say is utter crap. Plus you have opeth lyrics in your signature.Dark One said:It's all Tate anyway, he's the reason why QR went from "god-like" metal status to a bunch of jokes.
It doesn't mean my opinion of Tate or what QR has done since 1994 will change or anything. Tate won't all of a sudden become worthy of total respect;
Tate's like a precursor to Anders Friden in terms of insisting that what the band is doing after dramitically changing their style and pissing of their hardcore fans is somehow still meaningful. a
IOfTheStorm said:You are clueless. Plus you dont even know what you are talking about. Plus what you say is utter crap. Plus you have opeth lyrics in your signature.
makes me totally gay for our resident Greek.IOfTheStorm said:I dont judge the album's music, thinking the possibility of a "fair and noble cause" behind it, but listening to ITS MUSIC.
Of course there is not. I normally wouldnt bother to explain my position when the other person is just saying crap, but since i "respect" this forum:Dark One said:Is there supposed to be a after this or not? If not, please explain your position. Thanks.
WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU SAYING HERE? First of all QR never CARED to have a "metal status" neither cared if some people (me included) thought of them as having "god like metal status". As i have said zillion times before, they always did what they wanted to do (only driven by musical expression), we liked it more then, we (you?, i like Q2k, and i like "Tribe" very much) dont like it now. Thats how it is.It's all Tate anyway, he's the reason why QR went from "god-like" metal status to a bunch of jokes.
And why Tate lost your (important isnt it) respect? Because he said that he never really listened to metal? Thats the truth and he was saying he doesnt really listen to metal even when the first albums were released. If not that, then WHAT?It doesn't mean my opinion of Tate or what QR has done since 1994 will change or anything. Tate won't all of a sudden become worthy of total respect;
I leave out of the table that you compare what Tate says with what Friden says, like they have the same history behind them, the same influential value, and the same right to claim some things. What QR are doing is meaningfull to THEM. This is obvious, especially for Tate (just read the lyrics of the recent albums). About "pissing their hardcore fans", what hardcore fans? I know people who claim they are "hardcore fans" but they hate "Empire" or "Promised Land", some other "hardcore fans" hate the EP or "The Warning" etc etc. In the end a "hardcore fan" is a fan of Queensryche, their innovation, their denial to remain stable, he is amazed by the changes this band went through even when commercial success was hitting their door (and they slammed that door back with releasing their absolute non commercial album : "Promised Land".). A "hardcore fan" for me can see how certain songs on "Tribe" and even on "Q2K" have the feeling and QR signature ALL OVER THEM, not whine about his band being not what HE wants.Tate's like a precursor to Anders Friden in terms of insisting that what the band is doing after dramitically changing their style and pissing of their hardcore fans is somehow still meaningful.
You're entitled to your opinion.IOfTheStorm said:What you are saying it just a bunch of crap, "plain and simple".
As per usual, your comments make very little sense.IOfTheStorm said:Most people will say lots of crap about the album, i justify some though, then again i must not justify anyone because they are all pretending to be wise musical prophets, some already analyzing that riff on the album's fifth track.
Whether you choose to believe me or not is obviously your perrogative. I said I'm not going to listen, and I won't. "Mindcrime" is my favorite CD of all-time, and I want nothing to tarnish it. Hearing how the story ends, from a band no longer creative enough to tell the story, would only serve to tarnish the original. I have no problem with someone who disagrees with my stance. However, in an ideal world, they would do so in an intelligent, cohernet manner.IOfTheStorm said:Zod already says that he's not even gonna listen to it (and of course we know that he will eventually)
What exactly do you believe musical forums are for, if not discussing opinions on music?IOfTheStorm said:Until then.. you may all imagine whatever you want, but keep it to yourself..we dont want anymore "music knowitall fathers"
Yes and thats why i think that most people's comments about Mindcrime II are funny, they are already discussing and analyzing music THEY NEVER LISTENED.What exactly do you believe musical forums are for, if not discussing opinions on music?