666!

the_3_toed_sloth said:
Given enough time anything possible will happen? Not necessarily, and that is the problem - we hypothesize possible paths life might have taken, but the further back we go the harder it becomes. Theres some evidence that RNA could abiotically lead to heredity, long before DNA existed, in combination with another theory (molecular cooperation theory), wherein if it came to be enclosed in a membrane it would replicate much faster than anything else. But the evidence only points towards RNA strands of length 14 as of yet...we just don't know enough yet to say that this is how it happened. It doesn't yet disprove the work of the divine at all.

PURE BIOLOGY VS. BIOCHEMISTRY
 
i've had lots of sex and gave it time but still no hot pink zebras. :)

these kinds of debates go ultimately nowhere because of the cold hard reality that there is not enough evidence to prove or disprove either side, and as such, it just goes back and forth with each presenting evidence, but not enough to win the tug-of-war. we now return to our regularly scheduled metal forum.
 
these kinds of debates go ultimately nowhere because of the cold hard reality that there is not enough evidence to prove or disprove either side, and as such, it just goes back and forth with each presenting evidence, but not enough to win the tug-of-war. we now return to our regularly scheduled metal forum.

What are you talking about? Of course there is not enough evidence to prove god exists or that he doesn't exist, but if you think there is not enough evidence to prove the evolution theory, you are quite an idiot.
The abiogenesis theory is something entirely else, but in 10-15 years from now it'll be just as solid a theory as the evolution theory is at this moment.