I'm gonna guess sound 2 is the AMT. I feel like it has too much low end to be a 'real' miced 5150.
on the AMT is this recorded directly out of the "CabSim" jack?
He mentioned in the first post the pedal went in the Peavey's power amp, and then into an actual cab and mic.on the AMT is this recorded directly out of the "CabSim" jack?
My guess is Riffs 1a and 2b are the pedal.
My guess is Riffs 1a and 2b are the pedal.
Thanks a lot for your kind words, gentlemen! It's time to lift the veil and name the clips:
Riff1 sound A is 5150
Riff1 sound B is P1
Riff2 sound A is P1
Riff2 sound B is 5150
Yeah I know P1 had a tad more low-end and sounded more "round" in general. I went as close as possible without any extrenal tone matching - as you know, each tone knob affects the others' behavior so it was the closest match I could do in a halfhour of testing.
It's time to lift the veil and name the clips:
Riff1 sound A is 5150
Riff1 sound B is P1
Riff2 sound A is P1
Riff2 sound B is 5150
I'm just going to ignore what people have said above since I disagree with all of them.
Out of those four clips I like the Riff1 Sound A best. I don't care what amp it is but it sounds best. The sound B of that was a darker version of that. Sound A sounds like there is more power behind it.
The Riff two feels like you reversed the sounds. The sound B on that was better IMO and sound A was the dark version of that. I preferred the sound B in that riff.
So if I assume that the Peavey "should sound better" my vote would be that "Riff1 sound A" and "Riff2 sound B" are Peavey.