bush vs donna

The God of Hellfire

thrashmaster 9000 pro
Oct 31, 2004
130
0
16
the woods
bush is better than donna because bush has a heavier more metal singing voice. bush is growley yet still comprehendible. Bush writes lyrics that are far more mature and complex than anything donnna has ever written or the band has written for him. bush also looks like a thrasher where as donna looks like a douche bag. but if you really think belladonna has half a chnce in hell of bringing thrash metal back then i say by all means but personally i think donna is a joke.
 
No doubt in my mind that Bush is the better musician, the albums that they did with him were amazing and top quality, Donna on the other hand is the voice that made Anthrax who they are, every old school like myself would love to see Donna on stage one more time, and I'm grateful that I have this opportunity now.
By the way Stomp is my favorite Thrax album so it just shows you what I really think of the Bush lineup
 
The God of Hellfire said:
bush also looks like a thrasher

???? I don´t think that Bush looks very "thrashy" (if there is something like a "thrash look") and in general Bush-era Anthrax had little or nothing to do with Thrash Metal as they left this genre when they released SOWN and only slightly returned to it with WCFYA.
 
Schurl said:
???? I don´t think that Bush looks very "thrashy" (if there is something like a "thrash look") and in general Bush-era Anthrax had little or nothing to do with Thrash Metal as they left this genre when they released SOWN and only slightly returned to it with WCFYA.
I dont know why people says that they left the Trash Metal with SOWN. Stomp is way far more eavy than SOE and POT. :OMG:
 
SOWN and Stomp aint thrash metal man.

bush and belladonna both rule but who really gives a fuck about who prefers who! really, what is the point in arguing about this, its never gonna achieve anything really is it? :Smug:
 
The God of Hellfire said:
bush also looks like a thrasher where as donna looks like a douche bag.

HAHAHHAHAHHA this comment is indeed hilarious and gives away what you really know about metal! I guess you never even experienced the thrash days but yet you declare Bush to look like a "thrasher" HAHAHHAHAHA!

He looked like a glamboy in the Amored Saint days (which was cool then I guess) and well I don't know what he looks like now but it shure as hell ain't a thrasher!
 
This is fucking stupid. Belladonna is great, Bush is great, the end.

It's like everybody would definately want to see another Elvis show, if he was alive, even though it'd propably suck big time. And I'm not sayong that Joey sucks, on the bootleg he sounds fine.
 
I can't believe this argument is STILL going on! The reunion tour is happening, then we'll have to wait and see what happens! Until then...DROP IT!!!
 
I think there both good but belladonna kicks his ass and some of your pointd are way off IMO. stomp442 and volume 8 great thrash? my arse. belladonna style anthrax on the other hand doesnt have one bad album.
 
I'm going tonight to see Anthrax in LA; the show has been sold out for the past week. It should be killer. I've seen both lineups over the past 20 years. Anthrax had their most successful years with Belladonna and Spitz. It's good to see the fun vibe back in the band. Judging my all the mp3s floating around, the energy is back in the band.......although I thought "Safe Home" was a good song.
 
if you keep postings threads like these, you´ll give the dumb asses the opportunity they want.
Of course Bush is better, but why do we always have to argue about this.
 
jerryskid1 said:
Anthrax had their most successful years with Belladonna and Spitz.

How many times do we have to go through this.
Anthrax had their most successful years back in the day, when metal was a mainstream thing. Danny and Joey didn´t have any real influence on that. Had they kept them in the band all the time, they would be playing for 10 people now.