no country for old wainds
Active Member
- Nov 23, 2002
- 26,696
- 9,669
- 113
My view is that black metal was written with opposition to Christianity at its centre, right from the beginning, and evolved with that as its defining factor.
Yes, you're right, but nothing can prevent someone from using black metal in a different direction. It will remain black metal because of the music.Gallantry over Docility said:My view is that black metal was written with opposition to Christianity at its centre, right from the beginning, and evolved with that as its defining factor.
It doesn't make sense to create music like that. The way it works is, that music is the outcome of the feelings, and certainly they way it doesn't work is to try to fit feelings in a certain kind of music. The outcome then would be possibly bad.AsModEe said:Yes, you're right, but nothing can prevent someone from using black metal in a different direction. It will remain black metal because of the music.
Fourka said:It doesn't make sense to create music like that. The way it works is, that music is the outcome of the feelings, and certainly they way it doesn't work is to try to fit feelings in a certain kind of music. The outcome then would be possibly bad.
Blodsmert said:It's subjective you dolts!
Black metal only sounds evil (ooo scary) because you are conditioned that way.
Rap music incites more crime than black metal, so that's far more evil. It also depends what you consider evil, it being relative. Societal rejects wearing make-up screeching about satan, or millionaire sociopaths, massively influential, encouraging children to take drugs and cap muthafuckas, whilst being disrespectful to bitches.
Gallantry over Docility said:My view is that black metal was written with opposition to Christianity at its centre, right from the beginning, and evolved with that as its defining factor.
Barking Pumpkin said:And that's what progressive music is about. Taking what's supposedly "defined" and changing it.
Barking Pumpkin said:And that's what progressive music is about. Taking what's supposedly "defined" and changing it.
Musically, Darkthrone is black metal.
- "But you just said black metal is not a purely musical definition! MAKE UP YOUR MIND YOU BM ELITIST / PROZAK-FELLATOR / ________ !"
So here's a relatively simple way of putting it, with the hope that it'll get through: black metal is the expression of a worldview / spirit / archetype / whatever you feel like calling it, from which the musical and ideological/lyrical formulas follow. Musically, this ideal CAN channel itself through several musical forms of metal, which are equipped for its expression, and that's what it generally tended to do for the first few years of its existence. Hence, certain bands - chiefly from that time period - might be black metal even when playing a form of NWOBHM, thrash, death/thrash, and so on so forth. Now, as this ideal progresses and solidifies itself, it may form NEW modes of sonic expression within metal, which are entirely its own, and thus are called purely "black metal" in the musical sense. Hence, the example of Darkthrone.
What you propose (strip away the Darkthrone ideology, and discuss the sound-waves) is a nice exercise in "what if", but has no meaning in reality - if the ideal/spirit did not exist, then Darkthrone's music wouldn't sound the way it does. That is, unless we are talking about mere imitators, who simply ape the sonic formula without having the spirit at its core, in which case the "pseudo-" tag is more than sufficient.
Agreed, no one denies that there are bands who sound distinctly black metal. Only that black metal is defined by that sound. Some people like to make the irrational (but understandable, I guess) leap from point A, that there are bands who sound black metal and fit no where else, to point B, that black metal is a certain sound that only these bands encompass (not realizing that doing so is a fallacy in that it rejects a whole slew of bands, in addition to having no common ground.) It's because of that fallacy that we have to look somewhere else, to the one place where we can find common ground between every black metal band, and also logically exclude certain bands who don't fit; that's the certain spirit that you talked about (which I define only as ideology as a mindset... again another common fallacy arises when people make the jump from the word "ideology" to "politics" or "lyrics.")
Yes, BM does not necessarily sounds evil, but it does sound dark, however I am not quite sure about the dark side of Christianity (I read that one on the Philosopher board). As far as I know, Christianity is about giving love and stuff like that. Can someone enlighten me please about the dark side of it that if expressed can easily result in a music that sound slike DM or BM?ProjectedBlack said:Black Metal sounds dark, not neccasarily "evil". I understand the point you're making, however you're being completely biased, Christianity can be a religion that deals with a lot of dark topics, so why can't it fit the dark feel of Black Metal? Believe it or not, it's just not all about "Praise Jesus!"
Certainly not, I listen to whatever music I like because it expresses my feelings and I like that. Whether it is evil or good, it doesn't really matter.metal music and culture is about a certain sense of freedom and isn't confined to just hatred and evil, if you think it should be confined to that, I say you're listening to the music for the wrong reasons.
If it is still called black metal it has to have at least the basic definition.Barking Pumpkin said:And that's what progressive music is about. Taking what's supposedly "defined" and changing it.
Fourka said:Yes, BM does not necessarily sounds evil, but it does sound dark, however I am not quite sure about the dark side of Christianity (I read that one on the Philosopher board). As far as I know, Christianity is about giving love and stuff like that. Can someone enlighten me please about the dark side of it that if expressed can easily result in a music that sound slike DM or BM?
My definition of black metal doesn't take feelings into consideration.Fourka said:It doesn't make sense to create music like that. The way it works is, that music is the outcome of the feelings, and certainly they way it doesn't work is to try to fit feelings in a certain kind of music. The outcome then would be possibly bad.
Yes, it can.Fourka said:Yes, BM does not necessarily sounds evil, but it does sound dark, however I am not quite sure about the dark side of Christianity (I read that one on the Philosopher board). As far as I know, Christianity is about giving love and stuff like that. Can someone enlighten me please about the dark side of it that if expressed can easily result in a music that sound slike DM or BM?