Angra - your original post did contain an opinion...yes. But I think your post ended up going towards being more a personal flame against him...
With the comments "whining", "spoiled", and "wake up to reality". In other words you're calling him a spoiled baby - just putting sugar coating on it. So my comment is how you've made two posts on "people here entertain me", yet you're just fueling those people by phrasing your sentences in way to be harmful and inciteful to them.
I have no beef with you, so don't think that. I think the post had pretty much ended before the rest of it emerged. It's turned into a praise Ken and his label thread - which is fine. Still, just because he doesn't agree with the facts - does not mean he's being stubborn to reality. He just has an opinion that differs from the facts of the business.
Should we tell people that insulting President Bush as being a bad leader to stop since they can't do anything about it? No - of course not - people express their opinions regardless if they can do anything about it.
Sometimes we would like too "SHUT UP!" of course - I know I would.
If someone came on the forums and just badmouthed Glenn or someone for no reasons - then anger would be justified. But to my knowledge, bh never directly insulted Ken or his label - more just the industry and the prospect together. He even admitted that they were on two sides of it at the end. I don't think anyone came out attacking Ken's label - it's just the idea that we've seen this happen before. It turned more into a rant by that - so I think the discussion was fine for the board. Both sides were presented, both sides discussed it, tempers flared, it's done, that's that! I have never - EVER - seen a debate occur on a forum without people getting mad at one another. And what's the result at the end of most debates? Everyone is on the same side they started. Go figure why we still have them...
I just want everyone on the PP board to love everyone!!! *group hug*
