Controversial opinions on metal

The first 3 Cancer albums are win.
All of Bolt Thrower's albums are win, even the most recent stuff.
SOS, Necroticism & Heartwork are win, Swansong blows major butt-fudge.
 
Judas Priest are rubbish.

"Nu-metal" wasn't entirely without merit, unless it applies solely to Limp Bizkit and Linkin Park.
 
Judas Priest are rubbish.

"Nu-metal" wasn't entirely without merit, unless it applies solely to Limp Bizkit and Linkin Park.

1) Nope.
2) The thing about Nu-metal most people don't realize is that it is totally different from rap-rock (which is Shrimp Bisquick and *nsync 'n' Park). Nu-metal is correctly identified as KoRn, Coal Chamber, Spineshank, Deftones, and Soulfly, et al. Certain albums by Machine Head, Fear Factory, and of course Sepultura (Roots) also qualify. As far as merit, that would go to the aforementioned Deftones and Soulfly, along with Sevendust for the most part.

i think he's talking about sots-era atg though lol

duh, lol
 
yeah well nobody gives a shit about nu metal, sots is just sugar metal & people who think priest are rubbish have only heard 80s material (and even then are wrong). somebody post something vaguely worthwhile