What a stunning piece of work. Bursts of melody, technical riffs without wankery, and his best vocals ever. I've been listening to it a lot lately and I'll go so far as to say it's the best Death album!!!
That's because these are the only two death metal bands that ever released masterpieces. :Spin:J. said:They never did release that one true masterpiece like Carcass or even Morbid Angel did.
That's it. It's like you listen to all the Death albums you can feel all the best elements coming together right at the end with their last album. I used to think that "Individual Thought Patterns" was their best, but in truth, I think I just fell for the 'dream team' lineup. As songs go, the stuff on SoP just seems to fall together quite nicely, and "Voice of the Soul" is filled with emotion to the brim. And I really didn't realize how great a drummer Richard Christy was...Demonspell said:A technically superb album, and a fitting swansong for a musician who refused to repeat himself and set out to improve upon his previous work each time.
Ever heard of Nile, Pestilence, or Melechesh you bastid?One Inch Man said:That's because these are the only two death metal bands that ever released masterpieces. :Spin:
It's just more emotional. That's all I can say. Just beautiful set pieces of guitar wizardry intertwined with these literal 'bursts' of melodic fireworks. Yes, ITP has that also, but not to the same extent.Is Sound of Perserverance markedly different from Individual Thought Patterns? I love that album but don't need something real similar.
Yes I agree. Symbolic is way too wanky for me, but I guess prog-heads would dig it.Symbolic is terrible. Chuck's vocals are ehhh... at best.
Oh ok, let me explain, but you just pointed out the key difference - it's "more melodic". I do, however, recognize that there are a billion riff changes on SoP. The big difference is that each riff has it's own core hook. I mean, just how amazing is that? It's quite remarkable where other bands write an entire song based on one or two riffs with hooks, and Chuck could just throw them out once in a verse and never look back.IOfTheStorm said:You think that Symbolic is wanky and SOP is not? I dont get it.
I dont think that SOP is wanky.. or anything like this, i love it. But i find strange how you can think that Symbolic is wanky since SOP is more technical and less heavy. More melodic probably too.
I really need to pay more attention then, what I remember is boring riffs and poor songwriting. It's been some years.JayKeeley said:Symbolic is way too wanky for me, but I guess prog-heads would dig it.
Of course I can rip you a CD-R, but you haven't even listened to my last batch yet.One Inch Man said:I really need to pay more attention then, what I remember is boring riffs and poor songwriting. It's been some years.
Alright, I'm sold on this. Probably won't pick it up for awhile unless Choadlumbia House has it for cheap.