Does being brutal make a band good?

there are not really brutal bands that are awesome, and very brutal ones that suck...
only brutality is not enough
 
AlphaTemplar said:
A lot of metalheads seem to consider brutality a virtue, extoling how heavy and extreme a band is. This really, really bothers me. I can record a jet engine, throw a bunch of distortion on it, and add some unintelligble grunting. That doesn't make it music. Bashing your head against a brick wall is pretty brutal, pretty insane, pretty extreme. But it's still stupid as fuck. Interesting melody and rhythm, creativity, instrumental/vocal talent, artistic vison and feelability (the degree to which you connect with the music) make a good band. Heavyness is merely a tool to make music interesting.

Agree? Disagree? Want some food?

I think I'm really gonna like it here :worship: :kickass: :headbang:
 
I don't think so, but when I think about it, I like some bands that wouldn't be on that list without brutality...

Definately not anyway
 
What a silly thread. Brutal Death Metal is brutal Death Metal, the more brutal the music the more brutal the Death Metal thus meaning if the musics intended purpose is brutality and that band are successful in creating brutality then they are a good band.
 
profanityisgay.jpg


its fucking nonstop with you.