I have a kind of off topic question for you guys.
Many of you talk about tracking D.I.s with an amp sim because it makes editing easier. Why is this exactly?
Do you simply cut the D.I. track in the necessary spots, monitor through the amp sim track, then reamp through the real amp?
-Joe
I think some peoples playing responds differently depending on what they are playing through.
So what Amp Sim do you all prefer for tracking then?
I find my self using Revlaver, Nick Crow and the SoloC.....
And edits are SO much less noticeable when they're to the DI's, rather than to already recorded tracks! (cuz if you have to have a slightly nasty edit, it gets smoothed over going through a mega distortion sandwich, rather than editing the already distorted harmonically-rich recorded track)
I think in the rest of the civilized world it's spelled 'colour'!
I've never reamped but always thought in the back of my mind, the only way to get a true 'performance' out of an amp was to actually play it. The way you react with the guitar, through the amp, affecting the speakers, it can be percussive. I'm 100% sure I play different depending on the tone.
No idea. I think for the most part they follow the 's' rule. I prefer the US spelling myself - less letters, more efficiency! So you'll usually find me saying 'mom', 'armor', 'favor', 'brutallzzzz'.