Why be pro- any race? What the fuck is the difference? What does being pro-white accomplish for you and the bettering of the human race?Dreamlord said:Being pro-white DOES NOT equal being anti-colored. All of the PC suck ups and civil rights groups and activists would have you believe it does, but I guess it's their constitutional right to be wrong.
Excellent question! We should all be pro-humanity, or pro-mankind. Unfortunately it does not seem to be like that.Papa Josh said:Why be pro- any race?
Best comedy line in the history of the genre:JayKeeley said:Erik, do you feel angst in knowing that I stole one of your white women?
UPN caters to an African American audience. I don't have a problem with BET, except for the name. If someone wanted to start a channel and called it White Entertainment Television, oh my Lord, Jeese Jackson would be fuming. Anyone see the hypocrisy?jimbobhickville said:I actually like BET because it takes all those shitty shows and conveniently places them on one channel I never have to flip to. Wait, there's still WB, nevermind.
I'm certain they do, as many European countries are modeled after the US. And Britian is almost a carbon copy.As for the quote, I'm gonna have to agree with it to a degree. I don't think there should be "white pride", but I don't think anyone should have pride is his ethnicity. I'm curious if other countries have the same backwards thinking as most Americans; do people in other countries get preferential treatment just based on their race?
Certainly not in the same way as the US where most preferrential treatment is aimed towards African Americans through some form of payback for hundreds of years of oppression. Black people in Britain may face discrimination, and of course they do, but they can never play the slavery card like black people can in the USA.jimbobhickville said:I'm curious if other countries have the same backwards thinking as most Americans; do people in other countries get preferential treatment just based on their race?
I happen to think that it was a disgrace for him to even have to take it to the courts. How is a turban going to detract from his job duty? What the fuck is a mounties hat going to offer, other than uphold the tradition of the uniform? And besides, they KNEW he was a Sikh when they gave him the job. It's not like he suddenly converted and decided to wear religious headgear. It wasn't until well afterwards that they brought up an issue with his turban.I think the saddest example I heard of was in Canada. There was a man from India who was a part of the RCMP (the Mounties) and he wore his turbin instead of the hat that was part of the required uniform. Anyway, he claimed racial prejudice and actually won. Nevermind that the dress code was required by the job.
Not really because most people don't need to have it spelled out to them. You don't have to label CBS or NBC as being "white" just because we already know they are. Here's a way to make your life simpler: for all the channels that are considered black, latino, chinese etc, take ALL the remaining channels and assume that they are white. There, done.Dreamlord said:UPN caters to an African American audience. I don't have a problem with BET, except for the name. If someone wanted to start a channel and called it White Entertainment Television, oh my Lord, Jeese Jackson would be fuming. Anyone see the hypocrisy?
Only in it's politics, not in its culture. European countries may be leaning more and more so towards consumer market driven lifestyles, but you'll never lose those thousands of years of culture. I can imagine this being more of an issue in Europe in fact than it is in the US, where the country was never "white" to begin with.I'm certain they do, as many European countries are modeled after the US. And Britian is almost a carbon copy.
Is that right? I just can't imagine that taking effect in reality. These aren't fashions you're talking about, but religous attachements. A Bhuddist monk isn't suddenly going to grow his hair out just because some fucker in the French government doesn't like it. Where did you read this btw?France just past a law that forbids people from wearing "religious" clothing in public, which means Jews can wear those little hats, Muslim women can't wear the face-covers or whatever, etc.
Therein lies the problem. I don't see CBS or NBC or ABC as "white", and I most certainly don't assume, because it's simply not true. Why should I? They all have shows that cater to people of all races, which is the way it should be.JayKeeley said:Not really because most people don't need to have it spelled out to them. You don't have to label CBS or NBC as being "white" just because we already know they are. Here's a way to make your life simpler: for all the channels that are considered black, latino, chinese etc, take ALL the remaining channels and assume that they are white. There, done.
I love the Spanish language. I took 4 semesters of it, although I don't remember shit.I mean, do people actually consider America to be a white country? I never did. That's certainly not how it's taught anyway. It wouldn't phase me in the slightest if, within 20 years, there are more Spanish speaking people than there are English. What's the big deal with it?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3325573.stmIs that right? I just can't imagine that taking effect in reality. These aren't fashions you're talking about, but religous attachements. A Bhuddist monk isn't suddenly going to grow his hair out just because some fucker in the French government doesn't like it. Where did you read this btw?
Man, I absolutely assume CBS, ABC, and NBC are white. Just as much as I do FOX. But why should all channels cater to all races? It shouldn't bother anyone because there are three million cable channels to choose from. America is the land of abundance. You're really that concerned that Chinese people might get their own channel that is broadcast only in Mandarin or Cantonese? Who cares? Let them have it. In the same way, it doesn't bother me that CMT only broadcasts Country music, or the Disney Channel only broadcasts Disney cartoons. How is anyone gaining or losing out with TV specialization?Dreamlord said:Therein lies the problem. I don't see CBS or NBC or ABC as "white", and I most certainly don't assume, because it's simply not true. Why should I? They all have shows that cater to people of all races, which is the way it should be.
Who said "whites own everything"? I don't see anybody owning anything, other than the select few Beverly Hills types that are rich beyond our wildest dreams. I have no idea what their skin color or ethnicity might be, however, but I'm pretty sure they 'aint Mexican.I'm not a believer in the ol' "<insert race here> should have their own <insert TV station, scholarship, etc here> because whites own everything" addage. That's just B.S. Other than a house and car, I don't own shit. And to be perfectly frank, I don't even own them, as I'm still paying for them.
Which Americans assume this? Is this a Texas thing? And how would the majority spoken language reflect the reality of who owns what? English will always be spoken as a primary language in business, media, and politics because that's what's been decided on a global scale. It's got nothing to do with white people owning everything, and never has.But I wonder if and when there are more Spanish speaking people in the US, will Americans still assume "whites own everything"?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3325573.stm[/QUOTE]
Dude, that is a proposal, not a legislation. And it only affects schools. I thought this was an actual new law or something. There are three thousand new proposals that go through the Houses of Parliament every week - that's what politicians do when they're not on campaigns. Even if it were to pass, and it wouldn't surprise me considering the French are the most right wing government in Europe, I can't imagine 5 millions muslims, or 10 millions jews happily playing along. There is just no way that they're going to sit back and say, 'ok then Jacques, whatever you say dude'.
I just don't assume the same things, then.JayKeeley said:Man, I absolutely assume CBS, ABC, and NBC are white. Just as much as I do FOX. But why should all channels cater to all races? It shouldn't bother anyone because there are three million cable channels to choose from. America is the land of abundance. You're really that concerned that Chinese people might get their own channel that is broadcast only in Mandarin or Cantonese? Who cares? Let them have it. In the same way, it doesn't bother me that CMT only broadcasts Country music, or the Disney Channel only broadcasts Disney cartoons. How is anyone gaining or losing out with TV specialization?
The "whites own everything" angle is widely used to justify minority-only channels, scholarships, etc...Who said "whites own everything"? I don't see anybody owning anything, other than the select few Beverly Hills types that are rich beyond our wildest dreams. I have no idea what their skin color or ethnicity might be, however, but I'm pretty sure they 'aint Mexican.