Hmmm, I suppose I see what you mean in a way. Stop at Nothing definately feels different from the earlier material, but its hard for me to pin down. The vocals aren't quite as strong for some reason, and the lyrics aren't quite as convincing, but on the plus side, I actually like the new drummer better. Stylistically, I think he's stronger (I love the fluidity of his double bass rolls) than Kev., and the overal feel of the album is more cohesive to me. I dunno, but listening from one song to the next, the album strings together at least as strongly as Killing on Adrenaline, and stronger than Destroy the Opposition (which is my favourite). I've always found it hard to memorise or remember Dying Fetus songs because to be honest, they're all filled with so many seemingly random riffs and structural variations. That's why I often feel Dying Fetus albums don't hold together that admirably....but Stop at Nothing does to me feel as if it has some continuity between the songs, which I think is a good thing. The problem that a band like Dying Fetus has is mainly song identity; individually they're all so great, but as a collection, they appear more to be just random collections of riffs making it harder to distinguish between them, because the quantitative value of the music (which is admittedly strong) is so overshadowed by the qualitative abundance of riffs/rhythms/ideas etc. I dunno, I just love them regardless, and I don't think Stop at Nothing is an inferior album in their career at all.