zabu of nΩd
Free Insultation
- Feb 9, 2007
- 14,270
- 770
- 113
maybe they were never happy with the sound quality before. and now that they have the money, they could fix it
~gR~
Yeah. Too bad it wasn't just the sound quality they 'fixed', though.
maybe they were never happy with the sound quality before. and now that they have the money, they could fix it
~gR~
Yeah. Too bad it wasn't just the sound quality they 'fixed', though.
i can understand the complaints about changing songs. but i imagine the keyboard part was taken out because they got sued or somthin
~gR~
Stormblast needed a makeover much more than For All Tid. At least you can hear the guitars on FAT.
ok, question... i havnt heard the stormlast reissue. what makes it different from the original?
~gR~
I paid little attention to their set, but I heard one song title mentioned, something with "California" in the title.
says the In Flames numba 1 fan...
Whats;s the big fucking deal about Mr. Stian?![]()
OH MY GOSH! CAPS LOCK RULZ!!!1!1!!!11
~gR~
his image was pretty cool.
Yeah top-hats are so fvcking metal.
Yeah, when I first saw a picture of him I wasn't sure of he was in a black metal band or a ragtime band!Maybe so, but it's a black metal album so I don't think the album itself is necessarily affected in a negative way. Certainly not to point of which that the album should be re-recorded. Usually if I have a problem with an album's production, I adjust the equalizer settings, rarely though. I don't think the production values on that album are that much worse than the original release of For All Tid though.