How do you view them?
I suppose there are two schools of thought on this subject. They are vocals that often just happen to be unintelligible or they are an instrument like any other called the larynx. Yes, to many this may simply sound like a semantic distinction, but changing my mental distinction from "vocals" to "instrument" is what helped me adapt many years ago to the style that was so very foreign/abrasive. To this day I don't really care what the lyrics are saying as I just don't see them as a lyric delivery system, and often enough if I do read the lyrics it somehow taints the song with foreign imagery that just isn't supposed to be there IMO. It's really quite similar to knowing the non musical details of any given artist...but that conversation was delved into more than enough in the Belus thread.
I suppose there are two schools of thought on this subject. They are vocals that often just happen to be unintelligible or they are an instrument like any other called the larynx. Yes, to many this may simply sound like a semantic distinction, but changing my mental distinction from "vocals" to "instrument" is what helped me adapt many years ago to the style that was so very foreign/abrasive. To this day I don't really care what the lyrics are saying as I just don't see them as a lyric delivery system, and often enough if I do read the lyrics it somehow taints the song with foreign imagery that just isn't supposed to be there IMO. It's really quite similar to knowing the non musical details of any given artist...but that conversation was delved into more than enough in the Belus thread.