cookiecutter
Proceed to Ultraslamming
Man, I am feeling so subjunctive right nowUhhh, no I'm pretty sure that guy's sentence was ungrammatical. I don't think he used the subjunctive properly. By the way, the subjunctive is a mood, not a tense.
Man, I am feeling so subjunctive right nowUhhh, no I'm pretty sure that guy's sentence was ungrammatical. I don't think he used the subjunctive properly. By the way, the subjunctive is a mood, not a tense.
If people have gone to the trouble of moving from a city or state where smoking is banned outside, this would most definitely infer that they're placing far more importance on that form of recreation than is necessary.
Satanstoenail said:If people have gone to the trouble of moving from a city or state where smoking is banned outside, this would most definitely infer that they're placing far more importance on that form of recreation than is necessary.
Almost. You just need to switch the word "infer" with "imply". Inferring is something that people do - it means to make a guess or deduce something. Implying is to suggest something without making it plainly obvious (i.e. leaving it for others to infer).
I think we all got the meat of the idea on the very first attempt at expressing it, hence fulfilling the purpose of that post.
I always thought "infer" and "imply" were interchangeable.
lolEx: Because his torso hurt, I inferred that it was an unnoticed knife stab wound.
I always that that infer meant to come to a conclusion based on the evidence. Ex: Because his torso hurt, I inferred that it was an unnoticed knife stab wound.
Imply means to suggest something without actually saying it.
Also, Greys, are you aware that the only reason people "smoke to relieve stress" is because not having cigarettes causes more stress anyway?
I'm saying the opposite of that. How is supporting the current situtation wanting to change the status quo, exactly? I'm fine with how it is now. It's you who wants to go back to the way it was. And from my perspective, the ban on smoking indoors, despite some early resistance, has been very well recieved. And obviously there has been enough support for it to become law all over this country and others.
Ah, I get it now. You just come from a place that has fucked up and archaic values. I guess I can't blame you for being such a savage, then.
And I still don't understand where you are getting the absurd idea that I am a "hill billy".
I always that that infer meant to come to a conclusion based on the evidence. Ex: Because his torso hurt, I inferred that it was an unnoticed knife stab wound.
Imply means to suggest something without actually saying it.
You and vihris-gari are correct. The definitions of infer and imply do not overlap.