rms
Active Member
Then what is the alternative position since you apparently can't just say what you believeIn no way does that statement imply that evolution is culturally driven.
You're imposing necessity onto an entirely accidental phenomenon.
it is a necessity because organisms are mortal!
What you're talking about isn't mutation, you're just talking about an organism starving so it eats whatever it can find.
exactly, so that "choice" facilitates mutations. exposing yourself to a new environment begins a process of mutations
So are you suggesting that mutation is cultural? I'm confused.
Cultural is too shallow of a scope. It's environmental, it's impossible for anything not to. Organisms exist because of an environment and they mutate because of it. Mutations occur because organisms respond to their environment. Because organisms mutate in response to their environment, their mutations become rooted in their genealogy or whatever the fundamental information carrying part of an organism is.
We see 'small' mutations within humans in relation to milk and lactose and peanuts. And this is all preliminary, our understanding of genes is very shallow as well.
My entire argument hasn't been about providing new evidence, it's been about how you're misreading the evidence that's there.
I did not ask for new evidence, I asked for evidence. I could say you are misreading it too but I have obviously offered several examples and for you I cannot think of one
Your jellyfish example proves absolutely nothing. I'm saying that it is theoretically conceivable that life could not exist, and evolutionary theory doesn't contradict this.
jellyfish that are more able to break down and create energy off of plastic are going to thrive versus those that do not, so pro-plastic jellyfish are going to thrive and alter the jellyfish wherever plastic is concentrated.
Again, this is not my position.
well this is unclear as I asked you what your position was and you never answered it directly:
this is your position? that biology is a social construct?
Sorry, but you are not reading this correctly at all.