Dak
mentat
None of this is to venture an extended critique, but I don't feel that his writing or his video appearances really warrant it.
They probably don't. What people are getting out of Peterson is having someone tell them what they need to hear and watch that someone walk the walk. I imagine his "12 Rules for Life" is far more popular than "Maps of Meaning". Probably the most legitimate criticism I've read of Peterson is that he needs to be "sending royalties to Aurelius and Seneca".
And finally, I find it really annoying that his material is only available in either a) countless videos online, or b) a poorly written monograph. I'd like to see an essay or something somewhere, but he seems to cater primarily to the online video crowd. I find it far more valuable to assess a position when it's in writing.
Well the market is in the videos. I don't get the impression he's all that interested in trying to break new philosophical ground via an argumentative paper. He's getting more meaning from doing what is functionally mass therapy, as well as having conversations with the likes of Dave Rubin and Sam Harris. For what it's worth, Sam Harris has said they are more or less agreed on like 98% of things. That difference afaik is in the value of religion.