CiG
Room with a View
I don't follow, are you two upset at the old definition or the new one? If the old, why are we talking about it?
My issue is with both definitions, but the main issue for me is that it doesn't include penetration by coercion.
I don't follow, are you two upset at the old definition or the new one? If the old, why are we talking about it?
Fertility isn't the same as sexuality, and cultural fascination with fertility does not translate into sexuality as a central component for an individual's identity.
As far as the crisis of gender identity goes, it isn't a crisis for those who feel a certain way - it was made into a crisis by people who told them they weren't supposed to feel that way.
Enlightenment ideas of utilitarianism and rationalism, and suggested that prisons should simply be used as a more effective substitute for public corporal punishments such as whipping, hanging, etc. This theory, often referred to as deterrence, claims that the primary purpose of prisons is to be so harsh and terrifying that they deter people from committing crime out of fear of going to prison. The second theory, which saw prisons as a form of rehabilitation or moral reform, was based on religious ideas that equated crime with sin, and saw prisons as a place to instruct prisoners in Christian morality, obedience and proper behavior. These later reformers believed that prisons could be constructed as humane institutions of moral instruction, and that prisoners' behavior could be "corrected" so that when they were released, they would be model members of society.
Prisons are not an effective deterrent, they are expensive, and increase recidivism. Compared to an incarceration model, I believe a restitution model to be far superior.
Are prisons supposed to be a deterrent? Always thought about this myself, sure it is perhaps somewhat true that it could be a deterrent, seems much more like a punishment to me though.
The fact that it unequivocally fails to deter is a point against it I guess.