The Truth for Battles is like Through Oblivion for SC. These songs dared to be something different and we could go back in IF's discography for others, like TCP or Metaphor. Regardless of their outcome, these songs were one offs on their respective record and you could love them or hate them, it did not really make or break any of those records. You won't necessarily like R2R just because you like Metaphor, and you won't necessarily hate ASOP just because you hate TCP:
The Truth is as pop-metal as you can get and whether it's good or not, whether we like it or not has been discussed to death. The problem is with the rest of the record being so fucking cheesy and simple, while being less innovative - within IF's body of work - than The Truth. Again, with bonus tracks and Underneath My Skin (who listens to that shit? a million times worse than Bottled) aside, Battles is either The Truth with a bit more metal and less electronics, while Save Me tries to imitate the "wtf"-factor of TT's, but Save Me is pure shit combined with good verses and nothing more.
I can totally get why someone would like Battles more than SC, I probably listen to it more nowadays than SC, but that doesn't mean much. When I travel, I like to listen to a lot of upbeat, poppy shit, and degenerate songs like In My Room and Before I Fall are perfect for that. Can't hear the instruments perfectly because you are walking by the highway? Who cares, save a few nice solos here and there, it's all about that chorus, so just pump up the volume and sing. That is the only thing Battles are good for. And karaoke. It's probably great for karaoke.
You can make valid arguments against SC - production, some songs being repetitive, copies from older songs, mixing, Anders' voice on it. But you can't be serious if you think more effort and heart went into Battles than SC. And by effort I don't mean net time on sitting in a room and coming up with the gayest possible choruses, or the time spent on making Anders sound like the guy who gets sent home from early auditions in The Voice, but he makes a metal band out of spite. No, I refer to the time and effort spent on trying to make a record that has a meaning and will be remembered as "the record that...". Yes, easy joke on saying "... was shit", but whatever, Battles is the record that was nothing. Battles should have been an EP of 4 or 5 songs before a tour cycle and nothing more, though it would have looked even worse if we were to compare it to Subterranean and ASOP B-sides.
After SC I stood by my opinion that In Flames should keep going, because - for all the reasons I've talked about before - SC is a worthy record to be labeled as In Flames, and that is not a statement about it being good or bad. But after Battles, I have serious second thoughts as time rusts that record.
Here's my dream of two possibilitis:
1. The boring one: they stop making more records and they will only tour. Maybe yeaaaars, yeaaaars later they move on to number 2.
2. They make one last record where they try to include as many contributors as they can get, but mainly ex-IF guys. Okay, Jesper don't want to tour anymore or listen to Anders, but IF is still his legacy, so it could be possible that he would agree to contribute on some songs for the last ever record. They can then keep touring after that ofc with whatever line-up.
No, I don't have hopes in going back to the road they just left with Battles, because Jesus has not showed me anything promising about his drumming capabilities (well, I heard he was okay live, but little good it does for a record) and they have no bass player. Also, knowing that Niclas contributed to the music this time does not get my hopes up either. I never listened to a single Engel song, but if this is all he can contribute, then just don't. I can't even stand how the guitar (or anything, besides the vocals+choirs) is mixed and tuned on that record. I thought the rocky style presented on SOAPF and SC is what I have to endure for the rest of their career, and then they came up with the watery shit that is Battles.
Ah, I'm a sad panda now. Jesper returns with a bang average record (where the best thing is the vocals, to add insult to injury) and I'm starting to slowly realize that within a year IF might drop something even more bland than Battles. I can't even imagine what could be less boring and unimaginative than that. If Battles is a glass of tap water, how lower can you go exactly? I mean, bottled water at least have a style, even if it tastes the same.