Who said otherwise? Who said that he contributed shit to the band? I stayed a fact. Then I proved that you were right as for his contribution to the first to albums, thing that you were just too lazy to do.
But that has nothing to do with a new beginning proving that he contributed a lot or nothing to the first years of the band. This is were you're wrong but, as ever, you're just too blinded by the fact that I'm saying this or that instead of discussing if what I say is right or wrong.
Allow me to explain it in a way that even you can understand it. Bjorn's apport to IF is beyond dispute. He was a big part of the band from the moment that he entered, and that does not change the fact that he was hired under the condition of playing the leads. Nobody suggested that the leads were only the solo parts. ThatsT you making assumptions.
A new beginning is as much proof of Björn's contribution as Through Oblivion is proof of his lack of contribution. They have nothing to do with it. His name in the credits is what tells us how.muvh he contributed to the band.
Did you understand or should I say it using more simple words?