Originally posted by Final_Vision
Another IF fan weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!
I hope you have your knowledge handy, these people are crazy and will murder the first in flames fan they see, ive been spared because im in a band with about 5 of em but the others......eh......
Originally posted by Ormir
Dark Tranquillity or In Flames?
It's the choice between heaven and hell
I think where In Flames loses out is variety. They've found their style, and obviously enjoy it, but after releasing so many albums with the same formula, they've gone stale. DT is far more innovative and brave, whereas IF is stuck in their style. IF has changed, I admit that, but to the worse. ever since Jester Race, the songwriting has become more mundane and dull, and less Gothenburg. The fact that the songs on the albums sound the same from beginning to end doesn't help much either.
IF is a great band, and alot of fun to listen to, but they don't have the same longevity and depth as DT, IF is not a band that I can imagine listening to ten years from now, still finding new nuances and feelings from the songs. Not to mention the lyrics, which in all honestly are just hideous...
I have my share of depth from bands like Dark Tranquility, Opeth, Dimmu Borgir, etc.
Originally posted by Belial
I love In Flames because they're outright heavy. I even enjoy Clayman because it's an hour of catchy, mindless head banging fun. I prefer them to Dark tranquility because IMO they just generally sound better.