Su Jacko
Member
I know Huyton schools get burned ever summer, which effects the school work but if your schools, houses and libraries get bombed then it makes it that bit harder for you and other kids to learn
Bambi said:nah, theres loads of instances of govts who werent at war carrying out acts of terrorism, israel, us , spain, UK, russia. Its all the rage, declaring war is sooo 1940s
Su Jacko said:I know Huyton schools get burned ever summer, which effects the school work but if your schools, houses and libraries get bombed then it makes it that bit harder for you and other kids to learn
CHRESTFALLEN said:You must find it very acceptable and secure to sit in your UK chair while all of you in UK are kissing American ass just to secure peace. You just copy in a bad way, "The American Way"...
Strangelight said:Dont be ignorant mate, UK government kiss Americas arse for sure, but dont accuse 100% of the public of doing it.
lord667 said:No, what I mean is that terrorism when it's backed by a government is not an act of terrorism, it's an act of war.
Don Corleone said:this is the most stupid thing i've heard lately. it's that easy like, eh? like black and white?
and for fuck's sake, dont expect anything from the US, they are being ruled by jews, they wouldnt go and support palestine or hamas, eh?
Don Corleone said:they wouldnt go and support palestine or hamas
So by the same token a member of a police force beating up someone they 'suspect' of a crime is committing an act of policing and not abusing the postion for gains...???lord667 said:Yes, it is black and white. A "terrorist" act, when committed by a national government, is an act of war. If you send your army or Secret Service into another country without international authority, to blow shit up or kill government officials, it's not "state terrorism", it's an act of war. If you think I'm wrong, explain how a government could order a "terrorist" act against another country without it being an act of war.
Su Jacko said:So by the same token a member of a police force beating up someone they 'suspect' of a crime is committing an act of policing and not abusing the postion for gains...???
Firstly, there is no accepted definition in international circles for terrorism, so i dont know where you get the idea that you can give a black and white definition for it. Maybe you should tell the UN that they arent up to speedlord667 said:Yes, it is black and white. A "terrorist" act, when committed by a national government, is an act of war. If you send your army or Secret Service into another country without international authority, to blow shit up or kill government officials, it's not "state terrorism", it's an act of war. If you think I'm wrong, explain how a government could order a "terrorist" act against another country without it being an act of war.
Allan said:Explain to me what difference it makes, if you call it an act of war or terrorism.
The killing of Yassin is just another example that Law without Enforcement is a MYTH. And where should the Enforcement for International Law come from when Israel commits a crime?siderea said:israel doesn't listen to any international law organisation.
puts all decisions of the united nations besides them, has nuclear weapons and still america doesn't demand international embargoes like 'no medication is allowed to go into that country' as we did to irak.
Bambi said:Firstly, there is no accepted definition in international circles for terrorism, so i dont know where you get the idea that you can give a black and white definition for it. Maybe you should tell the UN that they arent up to speed
But just as an aside, explain to me how the french bombing the rainbow warrior was an act of war rather than an act of terrorism? Or maybe what the brits were up to in dublin and monaghan in 1974?? Or what the indonesian government did to tamils and christians...can you commit acts of war against your own population??